Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Default stackableVersion to operator version #493

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 3, 2023

Conversation

sbernauer
Copy link
Member

@sbernauer sbernauer commented Aug 2, 2023

Description

Part of stackabletech/issues#404

Definition of Done Checklist

  • Not all of these items are applicable to all PRs, the author should update this template to only leave the boxes in that are relevant
  • Please make sure all these things are done and tick the boxes

Author

Preview Give feedback

Reviewer

Preview Give feedback

Acceptance

Preview Give feedback

CHANGELOG.md Outdated
@@ -4,6 +4,12 @@ All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.

## [Unreleased]

### Added

- Default stackableVersion to operator version ([#493]).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd say this needs a more prominent warning that this is a CRD change?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you have any suggestion of what it could look like? Its non-breaking btw ;)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Non-breaking but will require people to update their CRD

Suggested change
- Default stackableVersion to operator version ([#493]).
- CRD Change: Default stackableVersion to operator version ([#493]).
While this is non breaking it changes the X field from Y to Z because it now FOO.
You will need to deploy a new CRD

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have not checked if it's valid Markdown but something along those lines.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

WDYT of

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As you are on vacation, and @siegfriedweber needs this PR to continue his work I would go with my proposed entry. We can continue discussing it here, after we reach a conclusion we need to change it in all operators anyway (so one operator more does not make a big change)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I need to resolve this for merging, reopening it afterwards

Cargo.lock Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sbernauer sbernauer enabled auto-merge August 3, 2023 07:38
@sbernauer sbernauer added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 3, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit 71203d9 Aug 3, 2023
@sbernauer sbernauer deleted the feat/stackable-version branch August 3, 2023 08:04
@sbernauer sbernauer self-assigned this Aug 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants