Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

PySpark tests #92

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 4, 2022
Merged

PySpark tests #92

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 4, 2022

Conversation

razvan
Copy link
Member

@razvan razvan commented Jun 30, 2022 •
edited by adwk67
Loading

Description

Bugfix: multiple redundant volume mounts with the same name for PySpark jobs.

Review Checklist

  • Code contains useful comments
  • (Integration-)Test cases added (or not applicable)
  • Documentation added (or not applicable)
  • Changelog updated (or not applicable)
  • Cargo.toml only contains references to git tags (not specific commits or branches)
  • Helm chart can be installed and deployed operator works (or not applicable)

Once the review is done, comment bors r+ (or bors merge) to merge. Further information

@razvan razvan requested a review from a team June 30, 2022 15:50
@razvan razvan marked this pull request as ready for review June 30, 2022 15:50
adwk67
adwk67 approved these changes Jul 4, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@adwk67 adwk67 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@razvan razvan merged commit bba639e into main Jul 4, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the pyspark-kuttl-tests branch July 4, 2022 08:12
@razvan razvan mentioned this pull request Aug 2, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@adwk67 adwk67 adwk67 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@razvan @adwk67