Skip to content

Conversation

bertiethorpe
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@bertiethorpe bertiethorpe requested a review from a team as a code owner September 17, 2025 14:08
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @bertiethorpe, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the configuration management capabilities for OpenHPC environments by introducing support for templated generation of the mpi.conf file. This change provides greater flexibility in deploying and managing MPI configurations, ensuring that the mpi.conf is correctly set up based on environment-specific variables, and automatically triggers a SLURM controller restart when changes occur. The primary goal is to streamline the deployment and update process for MPI configurations.

Highlights

  • MPI Configuration Templating: A new Ansible task has been introduced to enable templating of the mpi.conf file. This allows for dynamic generation of MPI configuration based on specified variables, improving flexibility and consistency across deployments.
  • Conditional Execution: The mpi.conf templating task is configured to execute only when the control plane is enabled (openhpc_enable.control) and when MPI configuration data (openhpc_mpi_conf) is provided, ensuring the task runs only when necessary.
  • Service Restart Notification: Changes to the mpi.conf file via templating will now trigger a restart of the slurmctld service, ensuring that the new MPI configuration is immediately applied and active within the SLURM environment.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds support for templating mpi.conf for Slurm. The implementation is straightforward, but there are a couple of areas for improvement. I've pointed out a potential runtime error in a conditional check and a variable naming collision that could be confusing. I've also noted an inconsistency with how configuration changes are handled compared to other similar tasks in the role. Addressing these points will make the new feature more robust and maintainable.

Copy link
Collaborator

@sjpb sjpb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not a full review, just spotted this.

@bertiethorpe bertiethorpe requested a review from sjpb September 18, 2025 08:04
@bertiethorpe bertiethorpe requested a review from sjpb October 7, 2025 08:45
Copy link
Collaborator

@sjpb sjpb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@bertiethorpe bertiethorpe merged commit 98f978f into master Oct 7, 2025
73 of 81 checks passed
@bertiethorpe bertiethorpe deleted the feat/template-mpi-conf branch October 7, 2025 09:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants