Support colima

[goshlanguage]

I needed to add colima in order to use thv in my current setup. Opening as draft as I'm traveling as I write this PR and haven't given due diligence of going through the Dev Guide. Hoping to share for guidance.

Before:

bin/thv client setup                       
A new version of ToolHive is available: v0.2.5
Currently running: v8ef1a70-dirty
Error: failed to create client manager: no supported container runtime available: container runtime not found

After:

bin/thv client setup
A new version of ToolHive is available: v0.2.5
Currently running: v8ef1a70-dirty
Successfully registered client: vscode
Successfully registered client: cursor
10:02AM INF Creating new client config file at /Users/rhartje/Library/Application Support/Code/User/mcp.json
10:02AM INF Creating new client config file at /Users/rhartje/.cursor/mcp.json

[dmjb]

@goshlanguage This makes sense to me. Feel free to update the branch and take it out of draft status.

[JesseObrien]

I added a PR that does almost exactly the same thing. I wanted to 👍 the support for this PR. I updated all of the docs to include Colima in mine.

[eleftherias]

Thanks for the PR @goshlanguage! I've added a suggestion inline about how this could be simplified.

[goshlanguage]

@eleftherias seems that your suggestion then will only work for Colima on mac, and not colima on linux. Are you sure that's what we want? Means I still can't use this on my linux environments.

edit: I haven't confirmed, so I will test this. I do like less code

[goshlanguage]

yeah unfortunately it looks like that's not a compatible approach:

➜  toolhive git:(support-colima) ./bin/thv client setup
A new version of ToolHive is available: v0.2.13
Currently running: vf0c65e0
Error: failed to create client manager: no supported container runtime available: container runtime not found

[eleftherias]

Thanks for trying it out on Linux! We do want it to work on both.
With the current proposal does it work on Linux, or is there still more to be done?

[goshlanguage]

Thanks for trying it out on Linux! We do want it to work on both. With the current proposal does it work on Linux, or is there still more to be done?

It worked with the original implementation. What do we want to do here? Restore that?

[eleftherias]

Thanks for trying it out on Linux! We do want it to work on both. With the current proposal does it work on Linux, or is there still more to be done?

It worked with the original implementation. What do we want to do here? Restore that?

Yes, let's get back to the one that worked on Linux as well.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 32 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 38.45%. Comparing base (d8461be) to head (4327cf8).
⚠️ Report is 29 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
pkg/container/docker/sdk/client_unix.go	0.00%	32 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1332      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   38.51%   38.45%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         174      174              
  Lines       20233    20265      +32     
==========================================
  Hits         7792     7792              
- Misses      11870    11902      +32     
  Partials      571      571              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[coveralls]

coverage: 35.866% (-0.1%) from 35.987%
when pulling 4327cf8 on goshlanguage:support-colima
into a0903c7 on stacklok:main.

[eleftherias]

Thanks for you effort on this @goshlanguage!