Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/SIP029-testnet-heights #5537

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 9, 2024
Merged

Feat/SIP029-testnet-heights #5537

merged 4 commits into from
Dec 9, 2024

Conversation

jcnelson
Copy link
Member

@jcnelson jcnelson commented Dec 6, 2024

This sets the primary testnet activation heights for SIP-029, as well as the primary testnet halvening schedule.

@jcnelson jcnelson requested review from a team as code owners December 6, 2024 20:25
@jcnelson jcnelson changed the title chore: pick testnet activation heights for epoch 3.1 and stacks halve… Feat/SIP029-testnet-heights Dec 6, 2024
jbencin
jbencin previously approved these changes Dec 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@jbencin jbencin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changing coinbase rewards on already mined blocks would break consensus on existing testnets, wouldn't it? I guess it's not a problem because we can just restart the testnets, right?

@jcnelson
Copy link
Member Author

jcnelson commented Dec 6, 2024 via email

obycode
obycode previously approved these changes Dec 6, 2024
@wileyj wileyj dismissed stale reviews from obycode and jbencin via 5a69d10 December 9, 2024 19:39
@wileyj wileyj enabled auto-merge December 9, 2024 19:44
@wileyj wileyj added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 9, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 1c4a4f6 Dec 9, 2024
1 check passed
@blockstack-devops
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@stacks-network stacks-network locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 17, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants