Skip to content

Conversation

@jferrant
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

…ing of breaking changes

Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <jacinta.ferrant@gmail.com>
obycode
obycode previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@obycode obycode left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! This is helpful

Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <jacinta.ferrant@gmail.com>
Jiloc
Jiloc previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2025
Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <jacinta.ferrant@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <jacinta.ferrant@gmail.com>
@jferrant jferrant requested a review from Jiloc October 20, 2025 16:44
@jferrant jferrant enabled auto-merge October 20, 2025 17:01
@jferrant jferrant added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 20, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 20, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 71.36%. Comparing base (a7d73af) to head (dbd41f1).

❌ Your project check has failed because the head coverage (71.36%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (a7d73af) and HEAD (dbd41f1). Click for more details.

HEAD has 109 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (a7d73af) HEAD (dbd41f1)
144 35
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #6614      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    79.88%   71.36%   -8.53%     
===========================================
  Files          571      571              
  Lines       351586   351586              
===========================================
- Hits        280856   250895   -29961     
- Misses       70730   100691   +29961     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
stackslib/src/chainstate/tests/consensus.rs 94.84% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 150 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a7d73af...dbd41f1. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Merged via the queue into stacks-network:develop with commit f4787ad Oct 20, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@jferrant jferrant deleted the chore/add-evaluated-epoch-to-expected-output-in-consensus-tests branch October 20, 2025 17:52
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 28, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants