Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Warn about future reserved words #1048
Warn about future reserved words #1048
Changes from all commits
c4250b4
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oof. Wouldn't it have been easier to detect the keyword identifiers in
Deprecation_analysis.ml
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You could. I like it in the parser for a variety of reasons - it really highlights the structure of the change (I think we should also move all the keywords we parse as identifiers into a separate nonterminal for the same organizational reason, and just not emit the warning for those). This will capture every identifier automatically, but in deprecation analysis we'd need to do it separately for Variables, FunDecls, FunApps, ConDistApps, ... etc. I think it's where it should live naturally, as it is something that is true at parsing time and doesn't need any type information or other structure (same reason
get_lp
andincrement_log_prog
are in the lexer).It just really, really highlights how bad the hack for parsing array[] notation is at the moment. We're basically trying to parse a variable which is indexed and then asserting after the fact that the variable's "name" is array and treating it's index notation as a dimension declaration. The fact that we need to unwind one of the warnings we generated as a result is hardly the worst thing about it.