-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add flags to get_dims and get_param_names #1245
Conversation
I'm currently running this against stan-dev/stan#3139 I am also going to run stan-dev/stan#3139 against the binaries from this branch. If those tests all pass, I think we should merge both PRs. If we don't want to go down this route we should revert #1241 and decide how to proceed. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1245 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.95% 88.98% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 64 64
Lines 9710 9734 +24
==========================================
+ Hits 8638 8662 +24
Misses 1072 1072
|
This and stan-dev/stan#3139 are now passing against each other. The merge order will need to be: Merge stan-dev/stan#3139, which will fail Merge this, wait for build to upload nightly binary Re-run |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚀
Follow on to #1241.
As discussed in stan-dev/stan#3139, updating an existing model_base method is sort of chicken-egg. This PR will fail as long as
stan
has the older definition of model_base, butstan
will fail as long as we're generating two ambiguous definitions in the models (not all of the Stan code that needs access to the model uses model_base as the interface, it seems)Submission Checklist
Release notes
Remove old version of
get_param_names
after #1241Copyright and Licensing
By submitting this pull request, the copyright holder is agreeing to
license the submitted work under the BSD 3-clause license (https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause)