-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix the issues causing FST codes not running #338
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ St_Survey *tableSet = new St_Survey("fstSensorOnWedge",108); | |
// | ||
for(int i = 0; i < 108; i++){ | ||
memset(&row,0,tableSet->GetRowSize()); | ||
row.Id = i+1; | ||
row.Id = i+1000; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Could you point to the code where it is used so we can see the problem? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm not sure if somewhere else will be affected, but for what I tested, the problem is in StRoot/StFstHitMaker/StFstHitMaker.cxx: There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thank you, Techuan. I added Xu and Zhenyu here to make sure everyone is on the same page. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I see that in the corresponding database table these sensor ids start from 1000, so this macro is supposed to follow the same numbering. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Dmitri, thanks for checking. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The formal requirements are met, so merge it anytime There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thanks, I will click the merge button. |
||
row.r00 = 1.0; | ||
row.r01 = 0.0; | ||
row.r02 = 0.0; | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed these lines appear to be identical to the ones above them. These were approved twice in #266 and #282 about 3 and 2 months ago. So much for the huge PRs