[stdlib] Try implement stackable nft

[jolestar]

尝试实现了一个可堆叠的 NFT，但遇到几个问题：

1. split 实际上是讲原来的 NFT 中的 quantity 减少，新铸造一个 NFT，会生成新的 id。可堆叠场景下，NFT 的 id 是否应该因为堆叠或者拆分而变化？
2. split 的时候需要 UpdateCapability，和 MintCapability，merge 的时候需要 BurnCapability， UpdateCapability。这样无法实现自动堆叠。

[github-actions]

Benchmark for 589751e

Click to view benchmark

Test	PR Benchmark	Master Benchmark	%
accumulator_append	2.1±0.11ms	2.1±0.07ms	0.00%
block_apply/block_apply_10	411.3±3.76ms	408.7±3.78ms	+0.64%
block_apply/block_apply_1000	42.0±0.41s	41.9±0.10s	+0.24%
get_with_proof/db_store	38.5±0.27µs	38.7±0.43µs	-0.52%
get_with_proof/mem_store	31.7±0.30µs	31.7±0.19µs	0.00%
put_and_commit/db_store/1	1169.5±45.41µs	1201.2±60.69µs	-2.64%
put_and_commit/db_store/10	2.2±0.33ms	2.3±0.35ms	-4.35%
put_and_commit/db_store/100	9.6±0.88ms	9.7±0.88ms	-1.03%
put_and_commit/db_store/5	1704.0±225.23µs	1900.8±165.30µs	-10.35%
put_and_commit/db_store/50	5.7±0.68ms	5.7±0.71ms	0.00%
put_and_commit/mem_store/1	63.5±5.57µs	63.3±5.60µs	+0.32%
put_and_commit/mem_store/10	586.2±46.95µs	588.7±45.49µs	-0.42%
put_and_commit/mem_store/100	5.7±0.81ms	5.8±0.84ms	-1.72%
put_and_commit/mem_store/5	297.0±23.99µs	299.3±23.87µs	-0.77%
put_and_commit/mem_store/50	2.9±0.18ms	2.9±0.19ms	0.00%
query_block/query_block_in(10)_times(100)	3.5±0.09ms	3.5±0.17ms	0.00%
query_block/query_block_in(10)_times(1000)	34.9±1.08ms	35.7±0.94ms	-2.24%
query_block/query_block_in(10)_times(10000)	354.8±4.29ms	350.8±3.95ms	+1.14%
query_block/query_block_in(1000)_times(100)	928.1±7.15µs	918.8±6.27µs	+1.01%
query_block/query_block_in(1000)_times(1000)	9.3±0.04ms	9.1±0.07ms	+2.20%
query_block/query_block_in(1000)_times(10000)	92.9±0.50ms	92.3±0.62ms	+0.65%
storage_transaction	43.3±3.20ms	41.5±2.48ms	+4.34%
vm/transaction_execution/1	349.9±0.57ms	350.2±1.04ms	-0.09%
vm/transaction_execution/10	124.3±1.76ms	124.3±2.23ms	0.00%
vm/transaction_execution/20	116.9±1.26ms	119.4±7.39ms	-2.09%
vm/transaction_execution/5	146.6±0.57ms	147.5±3.09ms	-0.61%
vm/transaction_execution/50	131.2±1.09ms	131.3±0.94ms	-0.08%

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2825 (429957f) into master (bca1183) will increase coverage by 0.18%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2825      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   31.44%   31.62%   +0.18%     
==========================================
  Files         510      510              
  Lines       44980    44980              
  Branches    20038    20038              
==========================================
+ Hits        14141    14221      +80     
+ Misses      17146    16958     -188     
- Partials    13693    13801     +108     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	31.62% <ø> (+0.18%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
commons/timeout-join-handler/src/lib.rs	40.43% <0.00%> (-2.12%)	⬇️
...ync/src/block_connector/block_connector_service.rs	31.12% <0.00%> (-1.11%)	⬇️
block-relayer/src/block_relayer.rs	25.61% <0.00%> (-0.60%)	⬇️
commons/service-registry/src/service_registry.rs	42.06% <0.00%> (-0.58%)	⬇️
executor/src/script_function_test.rs	8.14% <0.00%> (ø)
miner/src/create_block_template/mod.rs	42.39% <0.00%> (ø)
commons/service-registry/src/service_actor.rs	38.71% <0.00%> (ø)
vm/vm-runtime/src/starcoin_vm.rs	29.29% <0.00%> (+0.14%)	⬆️
...etwork-p2p/src/protocol/generic_proto/behaviour.rs	20.74% <0.00%> (+0.27%)	⬆️
rpc/client/src/lib.rs	12.60% <0.00%> (+0.41%)	⬆️
... and 13 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bca1183...429957f. Read the comment docs.