-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
nim-status-go shim #5
Comments
from a practical pov, it might make sense to to name the exported symbols slightly differently - in v0.1, we could prefix them with there is reason to put two shims in place - this is a very common strategy when doing language interop:
as far as development goes, putting |
@Samyoul pointed out there is a document detailing the api currently used status-im/specs#136 this what we should use as a reference |
Introduce a Nim implementation of `hashMessage` situated in a reorganized library with *Nim-oriented* and *C-oriented* entry points inspired by the [shim strategy][shim-strat] suggested by @arnetheduck. The goal of this approach (per @iurimatias, at least as I understood what was discussed and tasked) is for Nim implementations of equivalent functionality to eventually supersede existing [status-go][sgo] implementations. These changes will benefit from feedback by @arnetheduck, @zah, @stefantalpalaru, @vitaliy, other members of stimbus/desktop, et al. – my dev experiences with Nim and C are quite limited to date. Some of the changes may be problematic, unnecessary, suboptimal, etc. I may have reified the *"shim strategy"* badly. Please shred this PR apart and lead me to the 💡 light. Thanks for your help! N.B. `tests-nim/login.nim` and `tests-c/login.c` use loops that never terminate (introduced prior to this PR). Future work will attempt to remedy that shortcoming but it's out of scope for this PR. The reorganized library can be grouped into two trees of `.nim` sources, but note that `import` statements interlink them. **Nim-oriented** ``` ├── src │ ├── lib │ │ ├── shim.nim │ │ └── util.nim │ ├── lib.nim │ ├── nim_status.nim │ ├── shim.nim │ └── types.nim ``` **C-oriented** ``` ├── src │ ├── c │ │ ├── lib │ │ │ └── shim.nim │ │ ├── lib.nim │ │ ├── nim_status.nim │ │ ├── shim.nim │ │ ├── sys.nim │ │ └── types.nim ``` The key difference between the Nim sources in one tree and the other is that `nim-status`'s Nim-oriented sources are intended to be consumed by other Nim sources (e.g. [status-im/nim-status-client][nsc] via Nim's built-in `import`), while its C-oriented sources are intended to be compiled to a C library (e.g. `nim_status.a`) and then linked/called by other C/C++ code. To that end, the former use `string` in their call signatures while the latter use `cstring`. Along the same lines, the C-oriented sources may return pointers to memory allocated with `c_malloc` such that it's up to the caller to free the memory occupied by the return values. Both `src/shim.nim` and `src/c/shim.nim` are pure shims around `status-go`, the main difference being their call signatures. Both `src/nim_status.nim` and `src/c/nim_status.nim` represent a hybrid (or amalgam) of `src/shim.nim` + `src/lib/shim.nim` and `src/c/shim.nim` + `src/c/lib/shim.nim`, respectively. With `src/lib.nim` the intention is to implement requisite functionality in a manner independent of `status-go`'s idioms. In `src/lib/shim.nim` the intention is to wrap around `src/lib.nim` in a way that preserves `status-go`'s call signatures. It may be that `src/c/lib.nim` is mostly pointless relative to `src/lib.nim`, in which case the former could be dropped. It's presently included as an illustration of the intentions explained above. `c_malloc` has been copied (in `src/c/sys.nim`) from the source of Nim's `system/ansi_c` because `ansi_c` is an undocumented internal API. A Nim template or pragma might be useful with respect to `c_malloc` used in `src/c/*`, i.e. to cut down on repetition. Use of `{.exportc.}` is limited (mostly) to the top-level `src/c/nim_status.nim` to avoid imposing exported symbols on C-oriented library consumers that may wish to compose an alternative to `src/c/nim_status.nim`. With respect to the Nim implementation of `hashMessage`, both Nim-oriented and C-oriented tests have been implemented. Whether that is really necessary/desirable for all *"replacement `proc`s"* is probably worth discussing. Adjust `.gitignore` and refactor `Makefile` accordingly; apply some lessons learned while working on [status-im/nim-status-client][nsc]. Closes #34. [shim-strat]: #5 (comment) [sgo]: https://github.com/status-im/status-go [nsc]: https://github.com/status-im/nim-status-client
Introduce a Nim implementation of `hashMessage` situated in a reorganized library with *Nim-oriented* and *C-oriented* entry points inspired by the [shim strategy][shim-strat] suggested by @arnetheduck. The goal of this approach (per @iurimatias, at least as I understood what was discussed and tasked) is for Nim implementations of equivalent functionality to eventually supersede existing [status-go][sgo] implementations. These changes will benefit from feedback by @arnetheduck, @zah, @stefantalpalaru, @vitaliy, other members of stimbus/desktop, et al. – my dev experiences with Nim and C are quite limited to date. Some of the changes may be problematic, unnecessary, suboptimal, etc. I may have reified the *"shim strategy"* badly. Please shred this PR apart and lead me to the 💡 light. Thanks for your help! N.B. `tests-nim/login.nim` and `tests-c/login.c` use loops that never terminate (introduced prior to this PR). Future work will attempt to remedy that shortcoming but it's out of scope for this PR. The reorganized library can be grouped into two trees of `.nim` sources, but note that `import` statements interlink them. **Nim-oriented** ``` ├── src │ ├── lib │ │ ├── shim.nim │ │ └── util.nim │ ├── lib.nim │ ├── nim_status.nim │ ├── shim.nim │ └── types.nim ``` **C-oriented** ``` ├── src │ ├── c │ │ ├── lib │ │ │ └── shim.nim │ │ ├── lib.nim │ │ ├── nim_status.nim │ │ ├── shim.nim │ │ ├── sys.nim │ │ └── types.nim ``` The key difference between the Nim sources in one tree and the other is that `nim-status`'s Nim-oriented sources are intended to be consumed by other Nim sources (e.g. [status-im/nim-status-client][nsc] via Nim's built-in `import`), while its C-oriented sources are intended to be compiled to a C library (e.g. `nim_status.a`) and then linked/called by other C/C++ code. To that end, the former use e.g. `string` in call signatures while the latter use `cstring`. Along the same lines, the C-oriented `procs` may return pointers to memory allocated with `c_malloc` such that it's up to the caller to free the memory occupied by the return values. Both `src/shim.nim` and `src/c/shim.nim` are pure shims around `status-go`, the main difference being their call signatures. Both `src/nim_status.nim` and `src/c/nim_status.nim` represent a hybrid (or amalgam) of `src/shim.nim` + `src/lib/shim.nim` and `src/c/shim.nim` + `src/c/lib/shim.nim`, respectively. With `src/lib.nim` the intention is to implement requisite functionality in a manner independent of `status-go`'s idioms. In `src/lib/shim.nim` the intention is to wrap around `src/lib.nim` in a way that preserves `status-go`'s call signatures. It may be that `src/c/lib.nim` is mostly pointless relative to `src/lib.nim`, in which case the former could be dropped. It's presently included as an illustration of the intentions explained above. `c_malloc` has been copied (in `src/c/sys.nim`) from the source of Nim's `system/ansi_c` because `ansi_c` is an undocumented internal API. A Nim template or pragma might be useful with respect to `c_malloc` used in `src/c/*`, i.e. to cut down on repetition. Use of `{.exportc.}` is limited (mostly) to the top-level `src/c/nim_status.nim` to avoid imposing exported symbols on C-oriented library consumers who may wish to compose an alternative to `src/c/nim_status.nim`. With respect to the Nim implementation of `hashMessage`, both Nim-oriented and C-oriented tests have been implemented. Whether that is really necessary/desirable for all *replacement `proc`s* is probably worth discussing. Adjust `.gitignore` and refactor `Makefile` accordingly; apply some lessons learned while working on [status-im/nim-status-client][nsc]. Closes #34. [shim-strat]: #5 (comment) [sgo]: https://github.com/status-im/status-go [nsc]: https://github.com/status-im/nim-status-client
Introduce a Nim implementation of `hashMessage` situated in a reorganized library with *Nim-oriented* and *C-oriented* entry points inspired by the [shim strategy][shim-strat] suggested by @arnetheduck. The goal of this approach (per @iurimatias, at least as I understood what was discussed and tasked) is for Nim implementations of equivalent functionality to eventually supersede existing [status-go][sgo] implementations. These changes will benefit from feedback by @arnetheduck, @zah, @stefantalpalaru, @siphiuel, other members of stimbus/desktop, et al. – my dev experiences with Nim and C are quite limited to date. Some of the changes may be problematic, unnecessary, suboptimal, etc. I may have reified the *"shim strategy"* badly. Please shred this PR apart and lead me to the 💡 light. Thanks for your help! N.B. `tests-nim/login.nim` and `tests-c/login.c` use loops that never terminate (introduced prior to this PR). Future work will attempt to remedy that shortcoming but it's out of scope for this PR. The reorganized library can be grouped into two trees of `.nim` sources, but note that `import` statements interlink them. **Nim-oriented** ``` ├── src │ ├── lib │ │ ├── shim.nim │ │ └── util.nim │ ├── lib.nim │ ├── nim_status.nim │ ├── shim.nim │ └── types.nim ``` **C-oriented** ``` ├── src │ ├── c │ │ ├── lib │ │ │ └── shim.nim │ │ ├── lib.nim │ │ ├── nim_status.nim │ │ ├── shim.nim │ │ ├── sys.nim │ │ └── types.nim ``` The key difference between the Nim sources in one tree and the other is that `nim-status`'s Nim-oriented sources are intended to be consumed by other Nim sources (e.g. [status-im/nim-status-client][nsc] via Nim's built-in `import`), while its C-oriented sources are intended to be compiled to a C library (e.g. `nim_status.a`) and then linked/called by other C/C++ code. To that end, the former use e.g. `string` in call signatures while the latter use `cstring`. Along the same lines, the C-oriented `procs` may return pointers to memory allocated with `c_malloc` such that it's up to the caller to free the memory occupied by the return values. Both `src/shim.nim` and `src/c/shim.nim` are pure shims around `status-go`, the main difference being their call signatures. Both `src/nim_status.nim` and `src/c/nim_status.nim` represent a hybrid (or amalgam) of `src/shim.nim` + `src/lib/shim.nim` and `src/c/shim.nim` + `src/c/lib/shim.nim`, respectively. With `src/lib.nim` the intention is to implement requisite functionality in a manner independent of `status-go`'s idioms. In `src/lib/shim.nim` the intention is to wrap around `src/lib.nim` in a way that preserves `status-go`'s call signatures. It may be that `src/c/lib.nim` is mostly pointless relative to `src/lib.nim`, in which case the former could be dropped. It's presently included as an illustration of the intentions explained above. `c_malloc` has been copied (in `src/c/sys.nim`) from the source of Nim's `system/ansi_c` because `ansi_c` is an undocumented internal API. A Nim template or pragma might be useful with respect to `c_malloc` used in `src/c/*`, i.e. to cut down on repetition. Use of `{.exportc.}` is limited (mostly) to the top-level `src/c/nim_status.nim` to avoid imposing exported symbols on C-oriented library consumers who may wish to compose an alternative to `src/c/nim_status.nim`. With respect to the Nim implementation of `hashMessage`, both Nim-oriented and C-oriented tests have been implemented. Whether that is really necessary/desirable for all *replacement `proc`s* is probably worth discussing. Adjust `.gitignore` and refactor `Makefile` accordingly; apply some lessons learned while working on [status-im/nim-status-client][nsc]. Closes #34. [shim-strat]: #5 (comment) [sgo]: https://github.com/status-im/status-go [nsc]: https://github.com/status-im/nim-status-client
Introduce a Nim implementation of `hashMessage` situated in a reorganized library with *Nim-oriented* and *C-oriented* entry points inspired by the [shim strategy][shim-strat] suggested by @arnetheduck. The goal of this approach (per @iurimatias, at least as I understood what was discussed and tasked) is for Nim implementations of equivalent functionality to eventually supersede existing [status-go][sgo] implementations. These changes will benefit from feedback by @arnetheduck, @zah, @stefantalpalaru, @siphiuel, other members of stimbus/desktop, et al. – my dev experiences with Nim and C are quite limited to date. Some of the changes may be problematic, unnecessary, suboptimal, etc. I may have reified the *"shim strategy"* badly. Please shred this PR apart and lead me to the 💡 light. Thanks for your help! N.B. `tests-nim/login.nim` and `tests-c/login.c` use loops that never terminate (introduced prior to this PR). Future work will attempt to remedy that shortcoming but it's out of scope for this PR. The reorganized library can be grouped into two trees of `.nim` sources, but note that `import` statements interlink them. **Nim-oriented** ``` ├── src │ ├── lib │ │ ├── shim.nim │ │ └── util.nim │ ├── lib.nim │ ├── nim_status.nim │ ├── shim.nim │ └── types.nim ``` **C-oriented** ``` ├── src │ ├── c │ │ ├── lib │ │ │ └── shim.nim │ │ ├── lib.nim │ │ ├── nim_status.nim │ │ ├── shim.nim │ │ ├── sys.nim │ │ └── types.nim ``` The key difference between the Nim sources in one tree and the other is that `nim-status`'s Nim-oriented sources are intended to be consumed by other Nim sources (e.g. [status-im/nim-status-client][nsc] via Nim's built-in `import`), while its C-oriented sources are intended to be compiled to a C library (e.g. `nim_status.a`) and then linked/called by other C/C++ code. To that end, the former use e.g. `string` in call signatures while the latter use `cstring`. Along the same lines, the C-oriented `procs` may return pointers to memory allocated with `c_malloc` such that it's up to the caller to free the memory occupied by the return values. Both `src/shim.nim` and `src/c/shim.nim` are pure shims around `status-go`, the main difference being their call signatures. Both `src/nim_status.nim` and `src/c/nim_status.nim` represent a hybrid (or amalgam) of `src/shim.nim` + `src/lib/shim.nim` and `src/c/shim.nim` + `src/c/lib/shim.nim`, respectively. With `src/lib.nim` the intention is to implement requisite functionality in a manner independent of `status-go`'s idioms. In `src/lib/shim.nim` the intention is to wrap around `src/lib.nim` in a way that preserves `status-go`'s call signatures. It may be that `src/c/lib.nim` is mostly pointless relative to `src/lib.nim`, in which case the former could be dropped. It's presently included as an illustration of the intentions explained above. `c_malloc` has been copied (in `src/c/sys.nim`) from the source of Nim's `system/ansi_c` because `ansi_c` is an undocumented internal API. A Nim template or pragma might be useful with respect to `c_malloc` used in `src/c/*`, i.e. to cut down on repetition. Use of `{.exportc.}` is limited (mostly) to the top-level `src/c/nim_status.nim` to avoid imposing exported symbols on C-oriented library consumers who may wish to compose an alternative to `src/c/nim_status.nim`. With respect to the Nim implementation of `hashMessage`, both Nim-oriented and C-oriented tests have been implemented. Whether that is really necessary/desirable for all *replacement `proc`s* is probably worth discussing. Adjust `.gitignore` and refactor `Makefile` accordingly; apply some lessons learned while working on [status-im/nim-status-client][nsc]. Closes #34. [shim-strat]: #5 (comment) [sgo]: https://github.com/status-im/status-go [nsc]: https://github.com/status-im/nim-status-client
Introduce a Nim implementation of `hashMessage` situated in a reorganized library with *Nim-oriented* and *C-oriented* entry points inspired by the [shim strategy][shim-strat] suggested by @arnetheduck. The goal of this approach (per @iurimatias, at least as I understood what was discussed and tasked) is for Nim implementations of equivalent functionality to eventually supersede existing [status-go][sgo] implementations. These changes will benefit from feedback by @arnetheduck, @zah, @stefantalpalaru, @siphiuel, other members of stimbus/desktop, et al. – my dev experiences with Nim and C are quite limited to date. Some of the changes may be problematic, unnecessary, suboptimal, etc. I may have reified the *"shim strategy"* badly. Please shred this PR apart and lead me to the 💡 light. Thanks for your help! N.B. `tests/nim/login.nim` and `tests/c/login.c` use loops that never terminate (introduced prior to this PR). Future work will attempt to remedy that shortcoming but it's out of scope for this PR. The reorganized library can be grouped into two trees of `.nim` sources, but note that `import` statements interlink some of them. **Nim-oriented** ``` ├── src │ ├── nim_status │ │ ├── go │ │ │ └── shim.nim │ │ ├── lib │ │ │ ├── shim.nim │ │ │ └── util.nim │ │ ├── lib.nim │ │ └── types.nim │ └── nim_status.nim ``` **C-oriented** ``` ├── src │ ├── nim_status │ │ ├── c │ │ │ ├── go │ │ │ │ └── shim.nim │ │ │ ├── lib │ │ │ │ └── shim.nim │ │ │ ├── lib.nim │ │ │ ├── nim_status.nim │ │ │ └── sys.nim ``` The key difference between the Nim sources in one tree and the other is that the Nim-oriented sources are intended to be consumed by other Nim sources (e.g. [status-im/nim-status-client][nsc] via Nim's built-in `import`), while the C-oriented sources are intended to be compiled to a C library (e.g. `nim_status.a`) and then linked/called by other C code. To that end, the former use e.g. `string` in call signatures while the latter use `cstring`. Along the same lines, the C-oriented `procs` may return pointers to memory allocated with `c_malloc` such that it's up to the caller to free the memory occupied by the return values. Both `src/nim_status/go/shim.nim` and `src/nim_status/c/go/shim.nim` are pure shims around status-go, the main difference being their call signatures. With `src/nim_status/lib.nim` the intention is to implement functionality in a manner independent of status-go's idioms. In `src/nim_status/[c/]lib/shim.nim` the intention is to wrap around `src/nim_status/lib.nim` in a way that preserves status-go's call signatures and formatting. For example, the `hashMessage` proc introduced in this PR in `src/nim_status/lib.nim` returns a hex string like `0xabcd...` while `lib/shim.nim` returns JSON that's a match for status-go: `{"result":"0xabcd..."}`. Both `src/nim_status.nim` and `src/nim_status/c/nim_status.nim` represent a hybrid of `go/shim.nim` and `lib/shim.nim`. Again, the goal is that over time more and more procs implemented in Nim replace the shims around status-go. Callers that don't need to consume return values formatted according to status-go conventions can use `lib.nim` directly, e.g. via `import nim_status/lib` or by compiling `src/nim_status/c/lib.nim` and linking/calling from C. `c_malloc` has been copied (in `src/nim_status/c/sys.nim`) from the source of Nim's `system/ansi_c` because `ansi_c` is an undocumented internal API. A Nim template or pragma might be useful with respect to usgae of `c_malloc` in `src/nim_status/c/*`, i.e. to cut down on repetition. Use of `{.exportc.}` is limited to the `src/nim_status/c/nim_status.nim` hybrid shim to avoid imposing exported symbols on C-oriented library consumers who may wish to compose things in a different manner. With respect to the Nim implementation of `hashMessage`, both Nim-oriented and C-oriented tests have been implemented. Whether doubling up the tests is really necessary/desirable for all `proc`s is probably worth discussing. Adjust `.gitignore` and refactor `Makefile` accordingly; apply some lessons learned while working on [status-im/nim-status-client][nsc]. Closes #34. [shim-strat]: #5 (comment) [sgo]: https://github.com/status-im/status-go [nsc]: https://github.com/status-im/nim-status-client
Introduce a Nim implementation of `hashMessage` situated in a reorganized library with *Nim-oriented* and *C-oriented* entry points inspired by the [shim strategy][shim-strat] suggested by @arnetheduck. The goal of this approach (per @iurimatias, at least as I understood what was discussed and tasked) is for Nim implementations of equivalent functionality to eventually supersede existing [status-go][sgo] implementations. These changes will benefit from feedback by @arnetheduck, @zah, @stefantalpalaru, @siphiuel, other members of stimbus/desktop, et al. – my dev experiences with Nim and C are quite limited to date. Some of the changes may be problematic, unnecessary, suboptimal, etc. I may have reified the *"shim strategy"* badly. Please shred this PR apart and lead me to the 💡 light. Thanks for your help! N.B. `tests/nim/login.nim` and `tests/c/login.c` use loops that never terminate (introduced prior to this PR). Future work will attempt to remedy that shortcoming but it's out of scope for this PR. The reorganized library can be grouped into two trees of `.nim` sources, but note that `import` statements interlink some of them. **Nim-oriented** ``` ├── src │ ├── nim_status │ │ ├── go │ │ │ └── shim.nim │ │ ├── lib │ │ │ ├── shim.nim │ │ │ └── util.nim │ │ ├── lib.nim │ │ └── types.nim │ └── nim_status.nim ``` **C-oriented** ``` ├── src │ ├── nim_status │ │ ├── c │ │ │ ├── go │ │ │ │ └── shim.nim │ │ │ ├── lib │ │ │ │ └── shim.nim │ │ │ ├── lib.nim │ │ │ ├── nim_status.nim │ │ │ └── sys.nim ``` The key difference between the Nim sources in one tree and the other is that the Nim-oriented sources are intended to be consumed by other Nim sources (e.g. [status-im/nim-status-client][nsc] via Nim's built-in `import`), while the C-oriented sources are intended to be compiled to a C library (e.g. `nim_status.a`) and then linked/called by other C code. To that end, the former use e.g. `string` in call signatures while the latter use `cstring`. Along the same lines, the C-oriented `proc`s may return pointers to memory allocated with `c_malloc` such that it's up to the caller to free the memory occupied by the return values. Both `src/nim_status/go/shim.nim` and `src/nim_status/c/go/shim.nim` are pure shims around status-go, the main difference being their call signatures. With `src/nim_status/lib.nim` the intention is to implement functionality in a manner independent of status-go's idioms. In `src/nim_status/[c/]lib/shim.nim` the intention is to wrap around `src/nim_status/lib.nim` in a way that preserves status-go's call signatures and formatting. For example, the `hashMessage` proc introduced in this PR in `src/nim_status/lib.nim` returns a hex string like `0xabcd...` while `lib/shim.nim` returns JSON that's a match for status-go: `{"result":"0xabcd..."}`. Both `src/nim_status.nim` and `src/nim_status/c/nim_status.nim` represent a hybrid of `go/shim.nim` and `lib/shim.nim`. Again, the goal is that over time more and more `proc`s implemented in Nim replace the shims around status-go. Callers that don't need to consume return values formatted according to status-go conventions can use `lib.nim` directly, e.g. via `import nim_status/lib` or by compiling `src/nim_status/c/lib.nim` and linking/calling from C. `c_malloc` has been copied (in `src/nim_status/c/sys.nim`) from the source of Nim's `system/ansi_c` because `ansi_c` is an undocumented internal API. A Nim template or pragma might be useful with respect to usgae of `c_malloc` in `src/nim_status/c/*`, i.e. to cut down on repetition. Use of `{.exportc.}` is limited to the `src/nim_status/c/nim_status.nim` hybrid shim to avoid imposing exported symbols on C-oriented library consumers who may wish to compose things in a different manner. With respect to the Nim implementation of `hashMessage`, both Nim-oriented and C-oriented tests have been implemented. Whether doubling up the tests is really necessary/desirable for all `proc`s is probably worth discussing. Adjust `.gitignore` and refactor `Makefile` accordingly; apply some lessons learned while working on [status-im/nim-status-client][nsc]. Closes #34. [shim-strat]: #5 (comment) [sgo]: https://github.com/status-im/status-go [nsc]: https://github.com/status-im/nim-status-client
Introduce a Nim implementation of `hashMessage` situated in a reorganized library with *Nim-oriented* and *C-oriented* entry points inspired by the [shim strategy][shim-strat] suggested by @arnetheduck. The goal of this approach (per @iurimatias, at least as I understood what was discussed and tasked) is for Nim implementations of equivalent functionality to eventually supersede existing [status-go][sgo] implementations. These changes will benefit from feedback by @arnetheduck, @zah, @stefantalpalaru, @siphiuel, other members of stimbus/desktop, et al. – my dev experiences with Nim and C are quite limited to date. Some of the changes may be problematic, unnecessary, suboptimal, etc. I may have reified the *"shim strategy"* badly. Please shred this PR apart and lead me to the 💡 light. Thanks for your help! N.B. `tests/nim/login.nim` and `tests/c/login.c` use loops that never terminate (introduced prior to this PR). Future work will attempt to remedy that shortcoming but it's out of scope for this PR. The reorganized library can be grouped into two trees of `.nim` sources, but note that `import` statements interlink some of them. **Nim-oriented** ``` ├── src │ ├── nim_status │ │ ├── go │ │ │ └── shim.nim │ │ ├── lib │ │ │ ├── shim.nim │ │ │ └── util.nim │ │ ├── lib.nim │ │ └── types.nim │ └── nim_status.nim ``` **C-oriented** ``` ├── src │ ├── nim_status │ │ ├── c │ │ │ ├── go │ │ │ │ └── shim.nim │ │ │ ├── lib │ │ │ │ └── shim.nim │ │ │ ├── lib.nim │ │ │ ├── nim_status.nim │ │ │ └── sys.nim ``` The key difference between the Nim sources in one tree and the other is that the Nim-oriented sources are intended to be consumed by other Nim sources (e.g. [status-im/nim-status-client][nsc] via Nim's built-in `import`), while the C-oriented sources are intended to be compiled to a C library (e.g. `nim_status.a`) and then linked/called by other C code. To that end, the former use e.g. `string` in call signatures while the latter use `cstring`. Along the same lines, the C-oriented `proc`s may return pointers to memory allocated with `c_malloc` such that it's up to the caller to free the memory occupied by the return values. Both `src/nim_status/go/shim.nim` and `src/nim_status/c/go/shim.nim` are pure shims around status-go, the main difference being their call signatures. With `src/nim_status/lib.nim` the intention is to implement functionality in a manner independent of status-go's idioms. In `src/nim_status/[c/]lib/shim.nim` the intention is to wrap around `src/nim_status/lib.nim` in a way that preserves status-go's call signatures and formatting. For example, the `hashMessage` proc introduced in this PR in `src/nim_status/lib.nim` returns a hex string like `0xabcd...` while `lib/shim.nim` returns JSON that's a match for status-go: `{"result":"0xabcd..."}`. Both `src/nim_status.nim` and `src/nim_status/c/nim_status.nim` represent a hybrid of `go/shim.nim` and `lib/shim.nim`. Again, the goal is that over time more and more `proc`s implemented in Nim replace the shims around status-go. Callers that don't need to consume return values formatted according to status-go conventions can use `lib.nim` directly, e.g. via `import nim_status/lib` or by compiling `src/nim_status/c/lib.nim` and linking/calling from C. `c_malloc` has been copied (in `src/nim_status/c/sys.nim`) from the source of Nim's `system/ansi_c` because `ansi_c` is an undocumented internal API. A Nim template or pragma might be useful with respect to usgae of `c_malloc` in `src/nim_status/c/*`, i.e. to cut down on repetition. Use of `{.exportc.}` is limited to the `src/nim_status/c/nim_status.nim` hybrid shim to avoid imposing exported symbols on C-oriented library consumers who may wish to compose things in a different manner. With respect to the Nim implementation of `hashMessage`, both Nim-oriented and C-oriented tests have been implemented. Whether doubling up the tests is really necessary/desirable for all `proc`s is probably worth discussing. Adjust `.gitignore` and refactor `Makefile` accordingly; apply some lessons learned while working on [status-im/nim-status-client][nsc]. Closes #34. [shim-strat]: #5 (comment) [sgo]: https://github.com/status-im/status-go [nsc]: https://github.com/status-im/nim-status-client
Nim-status-go shim
Introduction
As a first step a shim layer would allow status-react to start using the nim library as soon as possible, we can then add new apis or replace status-go apis with nim ones in a steady, iterative manner instead of a big branch approach. Since the API is the same, that library should work without almost any changes required from status-react.
Approach
Using status-go as library in nim has been shown in nim-status-client as seen here
To get the shim working, we can create a striped down version of the build system of nim-status-client that only uses libstatus (i.e not QT nor any other libraries) and outputs an static library that then can be used in status-react.
to summarize:
Tests
There should be tests in nim for each of the exposed APIs to ensure they are working as expected.
Existing work
Potential problems / issues to explore
cstring
andGoString
, when re-exposing these apis we should make sure it still works as expectedsetSignalEventCallback
will work as expectednote: the spec part of this task will be added to status-im/specs later
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: