Update common issues to include __init__ without arguments (#8303) #15
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is the implication of #5677 where the return type of `__init__` is inferred given that at least one argument is typed. However, if no argument is present in `__init__`, `-> None` becomes compulsory if we are to enable type-checking on that method without using `--check-untyped-defs` flag. I believe it is worth mentioning in the section of "No errors reported for obviously wrong code".
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the implication of python#5677 where the return type of
__init__is inferred given that at least one argument is typed.However, if no argument is present in
__init__,-> Nonebecomes compulsory if we are to enable type-checking on that method without using--check-untyped-defsflag. I believe it is worth mentioning in the section of "No errors reported for obviously wrong code".