Refactor changes #880
Refactor changes #880
Conversation
| @@ -1806,6 +1801,15 @@ && isValidMethodName(method.getName())) { | |||
| } | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| private boolean isValidMethod(int modifiers,Method method) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please add a JavaDoc comment to this new method.
| @@ -113,24 +113,38 @@ public static JSONObject toJSONObject(String string) throws JSONException { | |||
| public static String toString(JSONObject jo) throws JSONException { | |||
| StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); | |||
| if (jo.has("Status-Code") && jo.has("Reason-Phrase")) { | |||
| sb.append(jo.getString("HTTP-Version")); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am not sure that the refactoring update in this method is a good idea. Although it shortens the method, it hides a more interesting potential refactoring - notice how many times status-code, reason-phrase, method, request-uri, and http-version are referenced in the conditionals. It makes the code look half-finished. Can you come up with a way to reduce the number of conditions being checked without affecting the output ordering?
| @@ -1762,12 +1762,7 @@ private void populateMap(Object bean, Set<Object> objectsRecord) { | |||
| Method[] methods = includeSuperClass ? klass.getMethods() : klass.getDeclaredMethods(); | |||
| for (final Method method : methods) { | |||
| final int modifiers = method.getModifiers(); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The variable modifiers is only used with the method isValidMethod. So there is no need for this local variable here.
Instead, it should be a variable inside the method isValidMethod and the parameter should be removed from the method signature.
|
Closed due to inactivity |
Hi @stleary
I have refactored some changes in following files : -