Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

🤖 Sync from open-cluster-management-io/config-policy-controller: #269 #912

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2024
Merged

🤖 Sync from open-cluster-management-io/config-policy-controller: #269 #912

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 7 additions & 3 deletions controllers/operatorpolicy_controller.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -476,8 +476,8 @@ func (r *OperatorPolicyReconciler) checkSubOverlap(
statusChanged = true
}

if resolvedSubLabel == "" {
// No possible overlap if the subscription could not be determined
// No overlap if the subscription could not be determined or if the policy is in inform mode
if resolvedSubLabel == "" || policy.Spec.RemediationAction.IsInform() {
if len(policy.Status.OverlappingPolicies) != 0 {
policy.Status.OverlappingPolicies = []string{}
statusChanged = true
Expand All @@ -504,6 +504,10 @@ func (r *OperatorPolicyReconciler) checkSubOverlap(

for _, otherPolicy := range opList.Items {
if otherPolicy.Status.ResolvedSubscriptionLabel == resolvedSubLabel {
if otherPolicy.Spec.RemediationAction.IsInform() {
continue
}

if !(otherPolicy.Name == policy.Name && otherPolicy.Namespace == policy.Namespace) {
overlappers = append(overlappers, otherPolicy.Name+"."+otherPolicy.Namespace)
}
Expand All @@ -522,7 +526,7 @@ func (r *OperatorPolicyReconciler) checkSubOverlap(

slices.Sort(overlappers)

overlapError := fmt.Errorf("the specified operator is managed by multiple policies (%v)",
overlapError := fmt.Errorf("the specified operator is managed by multiple enforced policies (%v)",
strings.Join(overlappers, ", "))

if !slices.Equal(overlappers, policy.Status.OverlappingPolicies) {
Expand Down
92 changes: 58 additions & 34 deletions test/e2e/case38_install_operator_test.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3120,32 +3120,30 @@ var _ = Describe("Testing OperatorPolicy", Ordered, Label("supports-hosted"), fu
mustnothaveYAML, testNamespace, gvrPolicy, gvrOperatorPolicy)
})

It("Should display a validation error in both", func() {
It("Should not display a validation error when both are in inform mode", func() {
check(
mustnothaveName,
true,
false,
[]policyv1.RelatedObject{},
metav1.Condition{
Type: "ValidPolicySpec",
Status: metav1.ConditionFalse,
Reason: "InvalidPolicySpec",
Message: `the specified operator is managed by multiple policies ` +
`(oppol-mustnothave.` + testNamespace + `, oppol-no-group.` + testNamespace + `)`,
Type: "ValidPolicySpec",
Status: metav1.ConditionTrue,
Reason: "PolicyValidated",
Message: `the policy spec is valid`,
},
`the specified operator is managed by multiple policies`,
`the policy spec is valid`,
)
check(
musthaveName,
true,
false,
[]policyv1.RelatedObject{},
metav1.Condition{
Type: "ValidPolicySpec",
Status: metav1.ConditionFalse,
Reason: "InvalidPolicySpec",
Message: `the specified operator is managed by multiple policies ` +
`(oppol-mustnothave.` + testNamespace + `, oppol-no-group.` + testNamespace + `)`,
Type: "ValidPolicySpec",
Status: metav1.ConditionTrue,
Reason: "PolicyValidated",
Message: `the policy spec is valid`,
},
`the specified operator is managed by multiple policies`,
`the policy spec is valid`,
)
})

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3181,20 +3179,38 @@ var _ = Describe("Testing OperatorPolicy", Ordered, Label("supports-hosted"), fu
}, "10s", "1s").Should(Equal(totalReconciles))
})

It("Should remove the validation error when the overlapping policy is removed", func() {
utils.Kubectl("delete", "operatorpolicy", musthaveName, "-n", testNamespace)
It("Should display a validation error when both are enforced", func() {
// enforce the policies
utils.Kubectl("patch", "operatorpolicy", mustnothaveName, "-n", testNamespace, "--type=json", "-p",
`[{"op": "replace", "path": "/spec/remediationAction", "value": "enforce"}]`)
utils.Kubectl("patch", "operatorpolicy", musthaveName, "-n", testNamespace, "--type=json", "-p",
`[{"op": "replace", "path": "/spec/remediationAction", "value": "enforce"}]`)

check(
mustnothaveName,
false,
true,
[]policyv1.RelatedObject{},
metav1.Condition{
Type: "ValidPolicySpec",
Status: metav1.ConditionTrue,
Reason: "PolicyValidated",
Message: `the policy spec is valid`,
Type: "ValidPolicySpec",
Status: metav1.ConditionFalse,
Reason: "InvalidPolicySpec",
Message: `the specified operator is managed by multiple enforced policies ` +
`(oppol-mustnothave.` + testNamespace + `, oppol-no-group.` + testNamespace + `)`,
},
`the policy spec is valid`,
`the specified operator is managed by multiple enforced policies`,
)
check(
musthaveName,
true,
[]policyv1.RelatedObject{},
metav1.Condition{
Type: "ValidPolicySpec",
Status: metav1.ConditionFalse,
Reason: "InvalidPolicySpec",
Message: `the specified operator is managed by multiple enforced policies ` +
`(oppol-mustnothave.` + testNamespace + `, oppol-no-group.` + testNamespace + `)`,
},
`the specified operator is managed by multiple enforced policies`,
)
})

Expand All @@ -3203,15 +3219,6 @@ var _ = Describe("Testing OperatorPolicy", Ordered, Label("supports-hosted"), fu
// which would slow down the suite. As long as no other test files use OperatorPolicy, the
// Ordered property on this file should ensure this is stable.
It("Should not cause an infinite reconcile loop when enforced", func() {
createObjWithParent(parentPolicyYAML, parentPolicyName,
musthaveYAML, testNamespace, gvrPolicy, gvrOperatorPolicy)

// enforce the policies
utils.Kubectl("patch", "operatorpolicy", mustnothaveName, "-n", testNamespace, "--type=json", "-p",
`[{"op": "replace", "path": "/spec/remediationAction", "value": "enforce"}]`)
utils.Kubectl("patch", "operatorpolicy", musthaveName, "-n", testNamespace, "--type=json", "-p",
`[{"op": "replace", "path": "/spec/remediationAction", "value": "enforce"}]`)

check(
mustnothaveName,
true,
Expand All @@ -3220,10 +3227,10 @@ var _ = Describe("Testing OperatorPolicy", Ordered, Label("supports-hosted"), fu
Type: "ValidPolicySpec",
Status: metav1.ConditionFalse,
Reason: "InvalidPolicySpec",
Message: `the specified operator is managed by multiple policies ` +
Message: `the specified operator is managed by multiple enforced policies ` +
`(oppol-mustnothave.` + testNamespace + `, oppol-no-group.` + testNamespace + `)`,
},
`the specified operator is managed by multiple policies`,
`the specified operator is managed by multiple enforced policies`,
)

recMetrics := utils.GetMetrics("controller_runtime_reconcile_total",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3252,6 +3259,23 @@ var _ = Describe("Testing OperatorPolicy", Ordered, Label("supports-hosted"), fu
return loopReconciles
}, "10s", "1s").Should(Equal(totalReconciles))
})

It("Should remove the validation error when an overlapping policy is removed", func() {
utils.Kubectl("delete", "operatorpolicy", musthaveName, "-n", testNamespace)

check(
mustnothaveName,
false,
[]policyv1.RelatedObject{},
metav1.Condition{
Type: "ValidPolicySpec",
Status: metav1.ConditionTrue,
Reason: "PolicyValidated",
Message: `the policy spec is valid`,
},
`the policy spec is valid`,
)
})
})
Describe("Testing templates in an OperatorPolicy", Ordered, func() {
const (
Expand Down