Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scripts: Transform scripts directory to type:module #24698

Merged
merged 26 commits into from
Nov 15, 2023

Conversation

valentinpalkovic
Copy link
Contributor

@valentinpalkovic valentinpalkovic commented Nov 3, 2023

Closes N/A

What I did

  • Set "type": "module" in scripts/package.json
  • Replaced ts-node in scripts by esbuild toolchain
  • Removed workaround for loading pure esm modules (e.g. execa)
  • Typescriptified scripts/check-package.js
  • Replaced require.main === module expression by esm equivalent
  • Set up scripts/jest.config.cjs to tell Jest how to properly run tests in esm environment
  • Removed shebangs, since they are not respected in a Windows environment
  • Adjust scripts/tsconfig.json to tell Typescript, that we are using ESM, but a bundler (moduleResolution setting) is used in the end. With that, we are not forced to use extensions for relative imports.

Checklist for Contributors

Testing

The changes in this PR are covered in the following automated tests:

  • stories
  • unit tests
  • integration tests
  • end-to-end tests

Manual testing

This section is mandatory for all contributions. If you believe no manual test is necessary, please state so explicitly. Thanks!

Documentation

  • Add or update documentation reflecting your changes
  • If you are deprecating/removing a feature, make sure to update
    MIGRATION.MD

Checklist for Maintainers

  • When this PR is ready for testing, make sure to add ci:normal, ci:merged or ci:daily GH label to it to run a specific set of sandboxes. The particular set of sandboxes can be found in code/lib/cli/src/sandbox-templates.ts

  • Make sure this PR contains one of the labels below:

    Available labels
    • bug: Internal changes that fixes incorrect behavior.
    • maintenance: User-facing maintenance tasks.
    • dependencies: Upgrading (sometimes downgrading) dependencies.
    • build: Internal-facing build tooling & test updates. Will not show up in release changelog.
    • cleanup: Minor cleanup style change. Will not show up in release changelog.
    • documentation: Documentation only changes. Will not show up in release changelog.
    • feature request: Introducing a new feature.
    • BREAKING CHANGE: Changes that break compatibility in some way with current major version.
    • other: Changes that don't fit in the above categories.

🦋 Canary release

This pull request has been released as version 0.0.0-pr-24698-sha-758c0de1. Install it by pinning all your Storybook dependencies to that version.

More information
Published version 0.0.0-pr-24698-sha-758c0de1
Triggered by @valentinpalkovic
Repository storybookjs/storybook
Branch valentin/use-type-module-in-scripts
Commit 758c0de1
Datetime Wed Nov 8 09:01:56 UTC 2023 (1699434116)
Workflow run 6795945840

To request a new release of this pull request, mention the @storybookjs/core team.

core team members can create a new canary release here or locally with gh workflow run --repo storybookjs/storybook canary-release-pr.yml --field pr=24698

@valentinpalkovic valentinpalkovic added the build Internal-facing build tooling & test updates label Nov 3, 2023
@valentinpalkovic valentinpalkovic self-assigned this Nov 3, 2023
@valentinpalkovic valentinpalkovic force-pushed the valentin/use-type-module-in-scripts branch from f428363 to 760f2b8 Compare November 3, 2023 10:06
@valentinpalkovic valentinpalkovic added the ci:daily Run the CI jobs that normally run in the daily job. label Nov 3, 2023
@valentinpalkovic valentinpalkovic changed the base branch from next to valentin/remove-lerna November 3, 2023 10:07
Copy link

socket-security bot commented Nov 3, 2023

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Packages Version New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
@types/window-size 1.1.4 None +0 5.1 kB types
jest_workaround 0.79.19 None +0 1.02 MB magic-akari

🚮 Removed packages: typescript@5.1.6

@valentinpalkovic valentinpalkovic force-pushed the valentin/use-type-module-in-scripts branch from 760f2b8 to 6bbedf1 Compare November 3, 2023 10:33
@valentinpalkovic valentinpalkovic force-pushed the valentin/use-type-module-in-scripts branch from 6bbedf1 to b7ef8c5 Compare November 3, 2023 10:42
Base automatically changed from valentin/remove-lerna to next November 7, 2023 14:35
@JReinhold
Copy link
Contributor

JReinhold commented Nov 8, 2023

What do you mean by this?

Replaced ts-up in scripts by esbuild toolchain

Our bundle scripts still use tsup, I don't see any changes to that?

https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/pull/24698/files#diff-f1388de49bfa818ab9841e27336be434f4b2174789389f7cdec7a3743f88c239

https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/pull/24698/files#diff-5548a29db85d623884df9f9582126025d3375e858931d16c4943002e231537d8

(Which I'm happy about, because tsup has many advantages over rawdogging esbuild for us, mainly that it supports generating .d.ts files, which esbuild doesn't)

@storybook-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Failed to publish canary version of this pull request, triggered by @valentinpalkovic. See the failed workflow run at: https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/actions/runs/6795743645

Copy link
Member

@IanVS IanVS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome cleanup here!

scripts/tasks/bench.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
};
})
.reduce((acc, next) => {
acc[next.name] = next;
return acc;
}, {});
}, {} as Record<string, { name: string; defaultValue: boolean; suffix: string; helpText: string }>);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of the cast, you might be able to provide a generic to reduce instead, which is a bit safer normally.

code/addons/a11y/package.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@valentinpalkovic
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ndelangen, I will wait for your approval before this gets merged to get in your opinion.

@valentinpalkovic valentinpalkovic added ci:daily Run the CI jobs that normally run in the daily job. and removed ci:daily Run the CI jobs that normally run in the daily job. labels Nov 9, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@JReinhold JReinhold left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💪🧹

package.json Show resolved Hide resolved
scripts/tasks/sandbox.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
@valentinpalkovic
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ndelangen friendly reminder

scripts/utils/esmain.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

socket-security bot commented Nov 14, 2023

👍 Dependency issues cleared. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

This PR previously contained dependency changes with security issues that have been resolved, removed, or ignored.

esbuild-register from scripts/node_modules
"check": "node --loader esbuild-register/loader -r esbuild-register ../../../scripts/prepare/check.ts",
"prep": "node --loader esbuild-register/loader -r esbuild-register ../../../scripts/prepare/esm-bundle.ts"
"check": "node --loader ../../../scripts/node_modules/esbuild-register/loader.js -r ../../../scripts/node_modules/esbuild-register/register.js ../../../scripts/prepare/check.ts",
"prep": "node --loader ../../../scripts/node_modules/esbuild-register/loader.js -r ../../../scripts/node_modules/esbuild-register/register.js ../../../scripts/prepare/esm-bundle.ts"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is pretty dang ugly. Are you sure this isn't a good enough reason to explore using tsx instead? ;)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@valentinpalkovic valentinpalkovic Nov 14, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tsx will be installed in scripts. It would then look like this:

"check": "../../../scripts/node_modules/tsx/index.js ../../../scripts/prepare/check.ts"

This is still ugly. A bit less ugly than the current solution, but still ugly. I don't see strong reasons for now to invest even more time into this PR.

Why should we introduce a tool, which builds on top of esbuild, if we can use esbuild directly and have no issues with it? I haven't seen strong reasons and arguments for introducing it so far.

Copy link
Member

@IanVS IanVS Nov 14, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh yeah that's not much better. Seems like something that can be cleaned up later if we find a nice way. Using NODE_PATH could also be an option, though I feel like it's discouraged / deprecated these days.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @IanVS

I have spiked a bit a solution using tsx. I haven't invested much time, but the following occurred:

The strange thing is, that named exports are not allowed to be imported with named imports.

e.g. fs-extra
Currently, we do named imports like this:

import { readJson } from 'fs-extra'; 

Node then complains and says:

import { readFile } from 'fs-extra';
         ^

SyntaxError: The requested module 'fs-extra' does not provide an export named 'readFile'
    at ModuleJob._instantiate (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:124:21)
    at async ModuleJob.run (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:190:5)

Indeed, if I go to the Readme of fs-extra the following is written:

ESM
There is also an fs-extra/esm import, that supports both default and named exports. However, note that fs methods are not included in fs-extra/esm; you still need to import fs and/or fs/promises separately:

import { readFileSync } from 'fs'
import { readFile } from 'fs/promises'
import { outputFile, outputFileSync } from 'fs-extra/esm'

Default exports are supported:

import fs from 'fs'
import fse from 'fs-extra/esm'
// fse.readFileSync is not a function; must use fs.readFileSync

So, I have to change all named imports to default imports.

The same error then occurs on relative file imports, like this one:

import { allTemplates } from '../code/lib/cli/src/sandbox-templates';
/Users/valentinpalkovic/Projects/storybook-next/scripts/task.ts:33
  allTemplates as TEMPLATES,
  ^

SyntaxError: The requested module '../code/lib/cli/src/sandbox-templates' does not provide an export named 'allTemplates'
    at ModuleJob._instantiate (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:124:21)
    at async ModuleJob.run (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:190:5)

I am not sure what’s going on here or why the error occurs with tsx, but not with the esbuild-loader

@ndelangen ndelangen merged commit e559a1e into next Nov 15, 2023
106 of 107 checks passed
@ndelangen ndelangen deleted the valentin/use-type-module-in-scripts branch November 15, 2023 08:48
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Nov 15, 2023
36 tasks
ndelangen added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build Internal-facing build tooling & test updates ci:daily Run the CI jobs that normally run in the daily job.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants