Remove unused chalice test code

[DoctorJohn]

Description

This PR removes Chalice test code that has been unused since we started sharing tests between HTTP integrations.

Types of Changes

• Core
• Bugfix
• New feature
• Enhancement/optimization
• Documentation

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

• Removed the unused Chalice test code that was previously used for HTTP integration tests.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR removes the unused chalice/app.py test file. This test file was unused since we started sharing tests between HTTP integrations.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Removed the unused chalice/app.py test file	Deleted the entire file	tests/chalice/app.py

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @DoctorJohn - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.95%. Comparing base (ddfc084) to head (b5a100a).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3739      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.22%   96.95%   -0.27%     
==========================================
  Files         502      501       -1     
  Lines       33428    33408      -20     
  Branches     5484     5480       -4     
==========================================
- Hits        32499    32390     -109     
- Misses        721      798      +77     
- Partials      208      220      +12     

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #3739 will not alter performance

_{Comparing DoctorJohn:remove-unused-chalice-test-code (b5a100a) with main (bd29cff)}

Summary

✅ 21 untouched benchmarks