Support Cvc Recollection and add fake to LinkConfirmationHandler

[toluo-stripe]

Summary

Support Cvc Recollection and add fake to LinkConfirmationHandler

Motivation

JIRA

Testing

• Added tests
• Modified tests
• Manually verified

Changelog

[github-actions]

Diffuse output:

OLD: identity-example-release-base.apk (signature: V1, V2)
NEW: identity-example-release-pr.apk (signature: V1, V2)

          │          compressed          │         uncompressed         
          ├───────────┬───────────┬──────┼───────────┬───────────┬──────
 APK      │ old       │ new       │ diff │ old       │ new       │ diff 
──────────┼───────────┼───────────┼──────┼───────────┼───────────┼──────
      dex │     2 MiB │     2 MiB │  0 B │   4.1 MiB │   4.1 MiB │  0 B 
     arsc │     1 MiB │     1 MiB │  0 B │     1 MiB │     1 MiB │  0 B 
 manifest │   2.3 KiB │   2.3 KiB │  0 B │     8 KiB │     8 KiB │  0 B 
      res │ 301.8 KiB │ 301.8 KiB │  0 B │ 455.5 KiB │ 455.5 KiB │  0 B 
   native │   6.2 MiB │   6.2 MiB │  0 B │  15.8 MiB │  15.8 MiB │  0 B 
    asset │   7.1 KiB │   7.1 KiB │  0 B │   6.9 KiB │   6.9 KiB │  0 B 
    other │  90.2 KiB │  90.2 KiB │ -1 B │ 170.3 KiB │ 170.3 KiB │  0 B 
──────────┼───────────┼───────────┼──────┼───────────┼───────────┼──────
    total │   9.6 MiB │   9.6 MiB │ -1 B │  21.5 MiB │  21.5 MiB │  0 B 

 DEX     │ old   │ new   │ diff      
─────────┼───────┼───────┼───────────
   files │     1 │     1 │ 0         
 strings │ 19971 │ 19971 │ 0 (+0 -0) 
   types │  6191 │  6191 │ 0 (+0 -0) 
 classes │  4982 │  4982 │ 0 (+0 -0) 
 methods │ 29772 │ 29772 │ 0 (+0 -0) 
  fields │ 17542 │ 17542 │ 0 (+0 -0) 

 ARSC    │ old  │ new  │ diff 
─────────┼──────┼──────┼──────
 configs │  164 │  164 │  0   
 entries │ 3622 │ 3622 │  0

APK

   compressed    │  uncompressed   │                                           
──────────┬──────┼──────────┬──────┤                                           
 size     │ diff │ size     │ diff │ path                                      
──────────┼──────┼──────────┼──────┼───────────────────────────────────────────
    272 B │ +1 B │    120 B │  0 B │ ∆ META-INF/version-control-info.textproto 
  1.2 KiB │ -1 B │  1.2 KiB │  0 B │ ∆ META-INF/CERT.RSA                       
 25.3 KiB │ -1 B │ 62.8 KiB │  0 B │ ∆ META-INF/MANIFEST.MF                    
──────────┼──────┼──────────┼──────┼───────────────────────────────────────────
 26.7 KiB │ -1 B │ 64.2 KiB │  0 B │ (total)

[amk-stripe]

I'm a little unsure of whether this is the best way to include CVC in the confirm call. Conceptually, it seems like maybe this should be part of the PaymentDetails type (though that type is public so we probably can't change it). Also how does the CVC value here relate to the CvcCheck in the ConsumerPaymentDetails.Card type?

[toluo-stripe]

The cvc field is obtained after cvc recollection and he payment details represents the payment methods obtained from the backend. We could wrap both values in a new data class.

[amk-stripe]

gotchaaa

[toluo-stripe]

I'll wrap both values in my integration PR

[amk-stripe]

gotchaaa