Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add AuBecsDebit support on PaymentMethod #1872

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2019

Conversation

shengwei-stripe
Copy link
Contributor

@remi-stripe @ob-stripe
cc @stripe/api-libraries

Adding AU BECS Debit to PaymentMethod

@remi-stripe remi-stripe self-assigned this Dec 6, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@remi-stripe remi-stripe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes look good to me but you are missing something in Mandate based on the java PR: https://github.com/stripe/stripe-java/pull/913/files
I recommend always working on stripe-java first. That way you don't have to try and find the changes, the PR automatically generated would tell you about the exact fields and it makes it easier for us to review.

Also, work with the local team to add docstrings to the new properties added so that you can add them in stripe-go

@shengwei-stripe
Copy link
Contributor Author

@remi-stripe Done, thanks for reviewing

Copy link
Contributor

@remi-stripe remi-stripe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We're still missing docs in PaymentMethodAuBecsDebit.cs can you add the docs?
Also can you squash all the commits?

Code reveiw: add Au BECS Debit to Mandate.PaymentDetails

Remove docs
@shengwei-stripe
Copy link
Contributor Author

@remi-stripe Done

@remi-stripe remi-stripe merged commit 1ed3f11 into stripe:master Dec 9, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants