-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 279
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Removal of REMs #105
Comments
Anybody have any thoughts on this? We've discussed this, and have seen lots of articles that go both ways on this. Curious what others think. |
I think we can safely drop rems.
I still see vague suggestions in recent design guidelines and blog posts to use rems/ems for accessibility, but the articles never state why or which browsers this is a requirement for. For example, this is from Google's a11y guidelines:
The WCAG doc for font sizing mentions that relative units are good for accessibility:
When you click through to the “User Agent Support Notes” to find out which browsers are affected by this, they mention IE 7:
As we don't claim to support IE 7 this may be a non-issue. I found one comment in a Medium post that IE 10 still does not support font scaling of absolute-sized fonts, but I couldn't reproduce this when testing in IE 10. |
@dreamwhisper @nathanrice Giving you right of first refusal here. :-) |
Noting a similar discussion in the Gutenberg repo in case this comes up again: WordPress/gutenberg#6454 |
Wanted to throw this up for discussion, based R.I.P. REM, Viva CSS Reference Pixel!.
Discuss.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: