Skip to content

Conversation

@EttoreSaetta
Copy link
Contributor

@EttoreSaetta EttoreSaetta commented May 25, 2022

Proposed Changes

Hello to everyone,
I would like to propose a slight change in the Actuator Disk with Variable Load function.

The change consists in re-writing the computation of the axial, radial and tangential force coefficients by developing the advance ratio term. In this way it is possible to eliminate the explicit dependence with the free-stream velocity.
Thanks to this change, it is possible to simulate the hover condition (free-stream velocity equal to zero) since we eliminated the free-stream velocity from the denominator.

In addition, we do not need the input of the advance ratio J, but the RPM of the propeller.

This is a draft PR since a validation is needed and will be provided soon.

Regards,
Ettore.
TAARG, University of Naples Federico II

Related Work

#1027

PR Checklist

  • I am submitting my contribution to the develop branch.
  • My contribution generates no new compiler warnings (try with the '-Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-empty-body' compiler flags, or simply --warnlevel=2 when using meson).
  • My contribution is commented and consistent with SU2 style.
  • I have added a test case that demonstrates my contribution, if necessary.
  • I have updated appropriate documentation (Tutorials, Docs Page, config_template.cpp) , if necessary.

@pr-triage pr-triage bot added the PR: draft label May 25, 2022
@WallyMaier WallyMaier changed the title Enable the hover simulation for the Actuator Disk with Variable Load [WIP] Enable the hover simulation for the Actuator Disk with Variable Load May 25, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 31, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If this is still a relevant issue please comment on it to restart the discussion. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jul 31, 2022
@stale stale bot closed this Aug 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants