Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade coap from 0.24.0 to 0.25.0 #238

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 13, 2021

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade coap from 0.24.0 to 0.25.0.

merge advice
ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released a day ago, on 2021-08-10.
Release notes
Package name: coap
  • 0.25.0 - 2021-08-10
  • 0.24.0 - 2020-07-09

    (blankm) Fix: Retrysend broken when passing socket to agent
    (mateusz-) Fix: fix missing responses to non-confirmable multicast request
    (JcBernack) Fix: update Buffer usage (prevent deprecation wanrings)
    (JsonMa) Fix: fix agent config bug
    (Apollon77) Fix: Add missing checks for Buffer length before reading from it
    (Apollon77) Update all dependencies
    (JsonMa) Fix: remove useless variables
    (JcBernack) Fix: Fix more flag during block-wise transfer

from coap GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: coap

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@suculent suculent merged commit 1ca2463 into master Sep 13, 2021
@suculent suculent deleted the snyk-upgrade-86497b9debc9465dbb1020cdaaf76d44 branch December 3, 2021 22:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants