Skip to content

Add Formatting Checks to CI #510

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 29, 2022
Merged

Add Formatting Checks to CI #510

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 29, 2022

Conversation

J0
Copy link
Contributor

@J0 J0 commented Jun 23, 2022

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Add formatting checks

What is the current behavior?

No checks

What is the new behavior?

Feel free to include screenshots if it includes visual changes.

Additional context

Add any other context or screenshots.

@J0 J0 requested review from hf and kangmingtay June 23, 2022 13:35
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ func (a *API) adminUserUpdate(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) error {
}
}

if terr := models.NewAuditLogEntry(tx, instanceID, adminUser, models.UserModifiedAction, "", map[string]interface{}{
if terr := models.NewAuditLogEntry(tx, instanceID, adminUser, models.UserModifiedAction, "", map[string]interface{}{
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i assume this and the one below are changes made by gofmt right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@J0 J0 Jun 29, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yup changes in source code files are made by Gofmt

@J0 J0 merged commit 30607dc into master Jun 29, 2022
@J0 J0 deleted the j0_add_formatting_checks branch June 29, 2022 01:05
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.7.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

uxodb pushed a commit to uxodb/auth that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants