Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[NHUB-534] Implement section filters async #1077

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

eos87
Copy link
Contributor

@eos87 eos87 commented Sep 6, 2024

Purpose

Implement the section filters management with new Async framework

What has changed

  • Added new model for section filters, service class and corresponding module
  • Updated views to use new endpoints group + reference to new service class

This PR depends on superdesk/superdesk-core#2688

Resolves: NHUB-534

The complexity of moving all the references to the new async service is too high to address in ticket NHUB-534.

NHUB-534
Copy link
Member

@devketanpro devketanpro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good to me.

dev-requirements.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
newsroom/section_filters/model.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
newsroom/section_filters/service.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
newsroom/section_filters/service.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
newsroom/section_filters/service.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
newsroom/section_filters/views.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
newsroom/section_filters/views.py Show resolved Hide resolved
newsroom/section_filters/views.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
newsroom/utils.py Show resolved Hide resolved
newsroom/utils.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@eos87 eos87 requested a review from MarkLark86 September 10, 2024 14:37
@eos87 eos87 merged commit e2f6a38 into async Sep 13, 2024
12 checks passed
@eos87 eos87 deleted the hg/NHUB-534-section-filters-async branch September 13, 2024 11:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants