Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor/rename superduper #2276

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 10, 2024

Conversation

blythed
Copy link
Collaborator

@blythed blythed commented Jul 9, 2024

Description

Related Issues

Checklist

  • Is this code covered by new or existing unit tests or integration tests?
  • Did you run make unit_testing and make integration-testing successfully?
  • Do new classes, functions, methods and parameters all have docstrings?
  • Were existing docstrings updated, if necessary?
  • Was external documentation updated, if necessary?

Additional Notes or Comments

Copy link
Collaborator

@jieguangzhou jieguangzhou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The following sections have been forgotten for modification.

  • docs/content/tutorials/rag/component.json
  • test/material/data/exported_component/component.json
  • the link urls in CHANGELOG.md
  • the link urils in README.md

@jieguangzhou jieguangzhou mentioned this pull request Jul 10, 2024
5 tasks
@blythed blythed force-pushed the refactor/rename-superduper branch 4 times, most recently from 6931061 to d8d605d Compare July 10, 2024 09:09
@blythed blythed force-pushed the refactor/rename-superduper branch from d8d605d to e1a236b Compare July 10, 2024 09:20
@blythed blythed merged commit fc9e2d9 into superduper-io:main Jul 10, 2024
3 checks passed
@blythed blythed deleted the refactor/rename-superduper branch October 27, 2024 13:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants