Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extrusion width and spacing #2084

Closed
macchinette opened this issue Dec 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Extrusion width and spacing #2084

macchinette opened this issue Dec 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
fix is live in the last release Please download /build the last release and try to reproduce.

Comments

@macchinette
Copy link

What happened?

I was trying to adapt the extrusion widths between the previous versions and the new ones and I realized that the default values given by the padlock were not correct compared to the previous versions.

2.3.57.8_2021-12-16 left photo ----------------------------------> 2.3.56.9 right photo
image

image

image

Project file & How to reproduce

In addition, as can be seen from the project sliced into both versions at level 31, the path in the center of the two perimeters is strangely divided into segments, which does not happen by increasing the extrusion widths.

image
2.3.57.8.zip
2.3.56.9.zip

Version

2.3.57.8_2021-12-16

Operating system

Windows 10

Printer model

Anycubic I3 Mega S

@supermerill
Copy link
Owner

First screenshot: there is some updates to make (yet) to the profile to remove these blue locks. Will do.
Second screenshot: forgot to check that 0 spacing will also do 0 width for the periemter & external perimeter. Will fix.
Third screenshot: this one is comparing apple an carrots, you didn't have the same settings activated in the left & right screenshot (see grey/black name, they are not the same).

extra question: This sis because the circles aren't circles but polygons. And the lines often didn't align, so there are thin spots and wide spots. That's why there is sometimes some problems. There is built-in mitigation system to try different width to use the best one, but it may fail, and it won't check a big amount of them.

@supermerill supermerill added the fixed for the next version That means that you should be able to test it in the latest nightly build label Dec 20, 2021
supermerill pushed a commit to slic3r/slic3r-profiles that referenced this issue Dec 22, 2021
@supermerill supermerill added fix is live in the last release Please download /build the last release and try to reproduce. and removed fixed for the next version That means that you should be able to test it in the latest nightly build labels Dec 22, 2021
DzzD pushed a commit to DzzD/SuperSlicer that referenced this issue Dec 26, 2021
DzzD pushed a commit to DzzD/SuperSlicer that referenced this issue Dec 26, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fix is live in the last release Please download /build the last release and try to reproduce.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants