-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 519
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature request]Z full step/mm setting #239
Comments
I just tough of that last week |
Of course :) |
seems to work without breaking. todo: change all slicing stuff from double to scaled int.
seems to work without breaking. todo: change all slicing stuff from double to scaled int.
was more work than i though |
Sorry, I'm a noob about programming. I thought it was possible to bring it directly from slic3r. |
the slic3r implementation is extremely naive (or efficient). And now, prusa added other way to compute layers. So I use it to round all layers computations and ensure that the manual, the automatic and the standard layers computation (+ supports) are all making z with a multiple fraction of it. |
seems to work without breaking. todo: change all slicing stuff from double to scaled int.
seems to work without breaking. todo: change all slicing stuff from double to scaled int.
seems to work without breaking. todo: change all slicing stuff from double to scaled int.
What parameters should I use when I don't know the Z steps for my printer? Can I disable it? |
put something low like the default one. |
by the way, setting it as 0 crashes the program :) |
erf, i didn't thought of it. Of course, there may be a division by 0... |
also change default for min_width_top_surface
Also increase precision from 3 to 6 for z if using z_step, because it may matters now. also change default for min_width_top_surface
What setting should I use for a stock Prusa Mk3S? |
As there is a Mesh bed leveling, the z stepper are never at a fulls tep, so if you want to use this field you need to know the microstep. |
Version
2.2.50+
Operating system type + version
any
3D printer brand / version + firmware version (if known)
any
Request
I've always wondered what level of precision can guarantee the management of continuously variable layers, where the Z axis remains for an entire layer in intermediate positions between the full steps, or in the layers where the supports are generated.
I believe that Ranellucci's approach (or jenkins?) to the problem is substantially correct.
I wonder if it was possible to port this optional and experimental setting also on slic3r++.
The version I have reviewed is the slic3r-1.3.1-dev-54a31eed of 2020-01-27, available here:
https://dl.slic3r.org/dev/win/
Is this a new feature request?
Yes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: