Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Deretraction inside the print #2689

Open
jaimebpg opened this issue Apr 12, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Feature Request: Deretraction inside the print #2689

jaimebpg opened this issue Apr 12, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
medium new Feature New feature or request

Comments

@jaimebpg
Copy link

When Printing with "external perimeter first" to improve surface finish and/or dimensional accuracy. Deratractions become an issue, they generate blobs when printing multiple parts and traveling thru open spaces.

I propose something like this:
lower nozzle inside the print -> deretract -> wipe -> lift nozzle and start extruding perimeter

@jaimebpg jaimebpg changed the title Deretraction inside the print Feature Request: Deretraction inside the print Apr 12, 2022
@supermerill supermerill added the new Feature New feature or request label Apr 13, 2022
@supermerill
Copy link
Owner

note to myself: like the little wipe that go inside at the end of the extrusion, but at the start.

@royal32
Copy link

royal32 commented Apr 13, 2022

Seconding this request! I've been running my own fork that does exactly this for a while now but my implementation is.... hacky at best. A properly coded implementation would be awesome.

royal32@ecf49d5

@supermerill
Copy link
Owner

@royal32 If I have to do it, i'll do mostly the same as you. Just use the coPercent type for percentage-only settings.

Is the "depth" factor really that useful?

@royal32
Copy link

royal32 commented Apr 13, 2022

The depth factor was for trying to tune for the best results without editing the code and recompiling every time, I just keep it at 5. too shallow and it doesn't have much of an effect, too "deep" and it can deretract outside of the part on thinner geometry. The exposed setting is nice to have but probably unnecessary. Yeah IIRC it's not exactly a percentage in the context of the actual equation. The percent sign is just because I copied the "Better bonding" setting.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
medium new Feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants