-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 526
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Infill/perimeters encroachment - inconsistent outcomes #2807
Comments
I have been noticing issues like this as well, but on all solid surfaces like this: |
@Sirnut |
* fix bad 2.4 merge * more robust for simplified slices #2807
@supermerill sorry to bring this up again, but is the solid fill in this area not inappropriate? In layer 23 you can see where there is gap fill and solid infill where the sparse infill should be placed |
* fix bad 2.4 merge * more robust for simplified slices #2807
I'll look into that. Thanks Merill |
Thank you Super Merill. I noticed that this issue is about 50% better since upgrading to 2.5 ( its been a while since I upgraded). Wish there was a complete fix appreciate your contributions! |
What happened?
Using different settings for Infill/perimeters encroachment yields wildly different top layer results.
Example images:
0% encroachment:
10% encroachment:
15% encroachment:
20% encroachment:
25% encroachment:
Project file & How to reproduce
Open attached project file, change "Infill/Perimeters encroachment" setting - observe top layer differences.
Testpiece20.zip
Version
nightly_dev (2e11c48)
Operating system
Windows 10
Printer model
Creality CR6 with Sherpa Mini direct drive
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: