Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

perimeter overlap #4

Closed
supermerill opened this issue Jul 24, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

perimeter overlap #4

supermerill opened this issue Jul 24, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement fix is live in the last release Please download /build the last release and try to reproduce.
Milestone
v52

Comments

@supermerill
Copy link
Owner

I want to see what can happen if i create a little overlap with the perimeter.
Does it help/destroy the overhangs, bridges, delamination?
@supermerill supermerill added this to the v52 milestone Jun 3, 2020
@supermerill supermerill added the fixed for the next version That means that you should be able to test it in the latest nightly build label Jun 11, 2020
supermerill pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 11, 2020
#4 perimeter overlaps : total control over perimeter width vs spacing.
514faa1 
 - add a spacing_ratio in flow, but it's only sed for two spacing in perimeter_generator, not sure about the usefulness of it.
 - external_perimeter_overlap now use the spacing_ratio to compute
 - add perimeter_overlap, using the spacing_ratio to compute
 - add perimeter_bonding, that shrink the external-internal spacing, without growing the infill polygons.
supermerill pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 17, 2020
#4 perimeter overlaps : total control over perimeter width vs spacing.
bbbb4d9 
 - add a spacing_ratio in flow, but it's only sed for two spacing in perimeter_generator, not sure about the usefulness of it.
 - external_perimeter_overlap now use the spacing_ratio to compute
 - add perimeter_overlap, using the spacing_ratio to compute
 - add perimeter_bonding, that shrink the external-internal spacing, without growing the infill polygons.
@supermerill supermerill added fix is live in the last release Please download /build the last release and try to reproduce. and removed fixed for the next version That means that you should be able to test it in the latest nightly build labels Jun 24, 2020
@n8bot n8bot mentioned this issue Jun 30, 2020
Closed
@supermerill supermerill mentioned this issue May 1, 2021
Closed
@CCS86 CCS86 mentioned this issue Feb 25, 2022
Open
@inspectionsbybob inspectionsbybob mentioned this issue Mar 28, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement fix is live in the last release Please download /build the last release and try to reproduce.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v52
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@supermerill