forked from prusa3d/PrusaSlicer
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 519
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Start gcode #4289
Labels
enhancement
fix is live in the last release
Please download /build the last release and try to reproduce.
Comments
G10 are already used for reprapfirmware, what is the issue? |
supermerill
added
the
fixed for the next version
That means that you should be able to test it in the latest nightly build
label
Jun 3, 2024
supermerill
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 3, 2024
supermerill
added
fix is live in the last release
Please download /build the last release and try to reproduce.
and removed
fixed for the next version
That means that you should be able to test it in the latest nightly build
labels
Jun 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement
fix is live in the last release
Please download /build the last release and try to reproduce.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When creating a custom printer, I can configure the start and end gcodes. But superslicer adds its own start gcode. If detects m109 or M104 this is not done. But in the case of reprapfirmware, these 2 commands are in process of being deprecated. So for the ones using new updated firmware this is causing problems because gcode is being inserted.
Also, the start gcode seems to nopt be adding command to heat heated chamber.
Also it introduces M107 wich is also deprecated on reprapfirmware (M106 S0 must be used now)
Describe the solution you'd like
Superslicer should also recognize the new commands (G10 and M141 for heated chambers too) Bed commands should be ignores because some printers with heated chambers dont use heated beds.
Describe how it would work
Be as descriptive as your skill level allows you.
Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context
Add any other context or paint drawing about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: