-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: <Route> received an unexpected slot "default" #3115
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
--- | ||
'@sveltejs/kit': patch | ||
--- | ||
|
||
fix `<Route> received an unexpected slot "default"` warning |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I used to do this trick in my other projects, but a caveat I found is that this would also rerender the component if only the child components change, which is sometimes undesirable, especially for route transitions. And so, I think we should fix the warning in Svelte side, and leave the code as is for now to prevent a potential breaking change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When does that happen? Are there situations where the upper level component stays the same but the underlying level changes to falsy?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm also curious about this — if we can fix it here rather than in Svelte, that would be preferable I think, since the warning is useful.
The
components
'branch' is an array of nodes, where every node except the leaf is a layout. Layouts always have a slotted child, leaves never do. Which means that I don't think there's ever a scenario in which a component could move between the consequent and the alternate — layouts will always be in the consequent, leaves will always be in the alternate.In other words this is a brilliantly simple (and in hindsight, obvious!) fix for this issue as far as I can see — thank you @bfanger! But I'd love to better understand @bluwy's concern before merging.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah thanks for the explanation. I wasn't sure what the
components
array would contain, but if the quirk I mention never happens. This looks good to me!