-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Param validators #4334
Param validators #4334
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 3555883 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
@@ -41,10 +42,13 @@ export function generate_manifest({ build_data, relative_path, routes, format = | |||
}); | |||
|
|||
/** @type {(path: string) => string} */ | |||
const importer = | |||
const load = |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I personally liked importer
a bit more to avoid conflating with the page load
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is quite far away from anything touching page
, but the endpoints constructed here do have a load
method, so it arguably makes more sense this way. though the reason i changed it was because we need both import(...)
and () => import(...)
, and while import
/importer
would have been a good combo, import
isn't a valid variable name whereas load
is.
@@ -114,6 +115,8 @@ export async function respond(request, options, state) { | |||
transformPage: default_transform | |||
}; | |||
|
|||
// TODO match route before calling handle? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
probably don't need to add this TODO so that we don't need to remember to remove it in #4344
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#4344 already removes it, it'll probably be an easier merge if we leave it in place
WIP. Adds parameter validators (#4291). Part 2 of 2, follows #4330.
Please don't delete this checklist! Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following:
Tests
pnpm test
and lint the project withpnpm lint
andpnpm check
Changesets
pnpx changeset
and following the prompts. All changesets should bepatch
until SvelteKit 1.0