Add ability to specify custom flags

[crazy-max]

Fixes #1 and also use @actions/exec instead of child_process dep

[svenstaro]

Awesome! I like the usage of @actions/exec! Could you also add the for the strip part in order to solve #1 in its entirety?

[svenstaro]

Perhaps you could also add a new complex example using these args to the end of the README?

[crazy-max]

Could you also add the for the strip part in order to solve #1 in its entirety?

I wonder what's the purpose of strip here ? UPX already handles this and this adds to this action another layer that could be unexpected for the user.

Perhaps you could also add a new complex example using these args to the end of the README?

Yes of course

[svenstaro]

In my tests, no stripping is done by UPX and the binary ends up a lot bigger without stripping.

[crazy-max]

@svenstaro I have just checked, you right! So I think we could add an input to enable/disable strip command because for Windows binaries strip could lead to unexpected behavior.

[svenstaro]

So far in my tests, strip was always available in GitHub Actions and is working as intendend.

[crazy-max]

I talked about final result when a Windows executable is stripped.
For example if I execute strip on innosetup-5.6.1-unicode.exe the stripped executable is broken.

[svenstaro]

I use this action here and it seems fine.

[crazy-max]

@svenstaro Ok I have made some changes ;)

[svenstaro]

Good changes so far, but I'm still missing the second example for the README with the args in use.

[svenstaro]

Seems good to me. Once the README is expanded this seems good to merge.

[crazy-max]

@svenstaro I have updated README with a complete example of the available inputs.

[svenstaro]

I'd prefer a second example. One for the simple case and one for the complex case. For reference, see https://github.com/svenstaro/upload-release-action

[crazy-max]

Done 🙂

[svenstaro]

Great stuff!

[svenstaro]

Released as 1.1.0.

[crazy-max]

Yeah 🚀 🎉