C#: Need a configuration setting to change the type for arrays

[artem-dudarev]

Currently arrays are generated as List<T>. I'd like to configure the generator to get real arrays T[].

[wing328]

@artem-dudarev do you mind sharing more about the requirement to use T[] instead of List<T>? Is that a must or more of a personal preference?

Before I started working on the C# generator, it was already using List instead of [] so I just keep it that way (both are fine with me).

[artem-dudarev]

This is not a must. I just think the property or method definition is shorter and more readable with array then with list.
Thats why I ask for configuration option.

[wing328]

@artem-dudarev thanks for the suggestion. We'll leverage the help from the community to implement this in the future.

[jimschubert]

Arrays aren't a direct replacement for List<T>. Specifically because initializing an array requires the array size and resizing an array is not cheap. Lists are a lot more efficient in practice.

If anything, I think IEnumerable<T> as exposed types and List<T> as internal types would be preferable.

[wing328]

@jimschubert thanks for the suggestion. May I know if you've cycle to contribute the enhancement?

[jimschubert]

I could do this work, but it would be a breaking change. For example,

List<Pet> FindPetsByStatus (List<string> status = null);

would become

IEnumerable<Pet> FindPetsByStatus(IList<string> status = null);

This would break code previously generated against List<Pet> by:

• Removing the indexer (e.g. pets[1])
• Removing ability to modify the collection
• Requiring explicit type usage to be changed (e.g. List<Pets> pets = client.FindPetsByStatus())

The benefit of using IEnumerable<T> would be that you're free to change any internal implementation without breaking consumers in the future.

The Framework Guidelines specifically say to not return List<T> from a public API, which I'd consider generated code. The guidelines suggest using Collection<T>, although when implementing APIs I try to stick with ICollection<T>. They've somewhat hidden my IEnumerable<T> suggestion within that collection suggestion:

In cases where you are sure that the only scenario you will ever want to support is forward-only iteration, you can simply use IEnumerable<T>.

I'd need to look at the code a little more closely to see how much effort it would be.

[jimschubert]

I created the linked pull request to demonstrate what this change would mean for consumers (see the updated tests). I chose ICollection<T> over IEnumerable<T> because ICollection<T> allows for modification.

[wing328]

@jimschubert thanks for the contribution. PR merged into master.