Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUGFIX] Jackson/@JsonUnwrapped - unwrapping fails when innerModel.$ref not null #4782

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mironbalcerzak
Copy link

@mironbalcerzak mironbalcerzak commented Nov 15, 2024

Issue ticket:
#4781

@mironbalcerzak
Copy link
Author

CC: @micryc

@mironbalcerzak mironbalcerzak force-pushed the 4781 branch 2 times, most recently from 74b7f5a to b82e212 Compare November 16, 2024 21:17
@T3rm1
Copy link

T3rm1 commented Nov 17, 2024

You should add a test. It's easier to see what you actually fix and might get it merged in faster. Unfortunately there are only two people of the maintainers left who showed very little activity in the past (30 commits in total over the last 6 months). I think the project has been mostly abandoned. There are so many open issues and contributions waiting and both @frantuma and @micryc seem to not care about them.

@mironbalcerzak mironbalcerzak changed the title #4781 Jackson/@JsonUnwrapped - unwrapping fails when innerModel.$ref not null [BUGFIX] Jackson/@JsonUnwrapped - unwrapping fails when innerModel.$ref not null Nov 17, 2024
@mironbalcerzak
Copy link
Author

@frantuma / @micryc - bump

@mironbalcerzak
Copy link
Author

@frantuma / @micryc - bump

1 similar comment
@mironbalcerzak
Copy link
Author

@frantuma / @micryc - bump

@mironbalcerzak
Copy link
Author

@frantuma / @micryc - bump

@mironbalcerzak
Copy link
Author

@frantuma / @micryc - bump

@T3rm1 - i am very patient 😂

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants