switch from U+2591 Light Shade to U+2592 Medium Shade #449
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some terminals (*e.g.* `gnome-terminal`) use the character to decide how dark or light the color should be, rather than showing the character itself (like *e.g.* `rxvt-unicode`). Light Shade looks OK in terminals that display the actual character, but too dark in terminals that use it as a brightness hint. Medium Shade seems to look good (at least, IMO) in both. See #196 (comment) .
xsebek
approved these changes
Jun 20, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some terminals (e.g.
gnome-terminal) use the character to decidehow dark or light the color should be, rather than showing the
character itself (like e.g.
rxvt-unicode). Light Shade looks OKin terminals that display the actual character, but too dark in
terminals that use it as a brightness hint. Medium Shade seems to
look good (at least, IMO) in both.
See #196 (comment) .