-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 247
Multithread processing source files #243
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
allevato
merged 1 commit into
swiftlang:main
from
keith:ks/multithread-processing-source-files
Nov 16, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rambling: I still have some concerns about the upfront flattening of the
FileIterator
being slow if the formatter is run in parallel on something like a networked file system or in recursive mode on the root of a large monorepo (who would do such a thing), but I should probably test my concerns against real data before going to the trouble of adding more work.If we need to change this in the future, I was concerned about having to do our own thread pooling, but maybe there's an easy alternative here: instead of flattening the whole iterator at once, just pull off a both sufficiently large and sufficiently small number of files at a time (say, 200, or a nice round number like 256) and loop over the batches while processing each batch with
concurrentPerform
. That would probably still get us good parallelism in the batches while avoiding eagerly flattening the whole array.You don't need to make this change now (I might be worried about the performance for nothing), but I just wanted to write it out here so I don't forget it later if we do need it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 good thoughts, I would definitely be interested to hear if you see issues with this given the large number of files.