Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Typo fix #167

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Typo fix #167

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions docs/AccessControl.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -100,9 +100,9 @@ Swift does not currently support private protocol conformances, so for runtime
consistency, the access level of the conformance of type T to protocol P is
equal to the minimum of T's access level and P's access level; that is, the
conformance is accessible whenever both T and P are accessible. This does not
change if the protocol is conformed to in an extension. (The access level of a
change if the protocol is conformed to in an extension (The access level of a
conformance is not currently reflected in the source, but is a useful concept
for applying restrictions consistently.)
for applying restrictions consistently.).

All members used to satisfy a conformance must have an access level at least as
high as the conformance's. This ensures consistency between views of the type;
Expand Down