-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[semantic-arc-opts] Follow ups to #30289 #30319
[semantic-arc-opts] Follow ups to #30289 #30319
Conversation
@swift-ci smoke test and merge |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like the renames. I guess this is part 1 of N.
Yes. |
I was hoping to do the small ones here and the larger one that we talked about (the data structure change) in a separate commit. |
@swift-ci smoke test |
This is a clearer name. It is also corresponds with the function isOwnershipForwardingInst that classifies such operands.
We are checking the unknown consuming use vector, so the name makes this clearer and makes it clear we are not talking about destroying consumers. I also eliminated the phiToIncomingValueMultiMap being passed in favor of a bool argument since that is how we are using it today. That was a vestige of an earlier version of the patch that had to be sunk.
2524120
to
09cfcbf
Compare
@swift-ci smoke test and merge |
@swift-ci smoke test linux platform |
1 similar comment
@swift-ci smoke test linux platform |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
kewl
Fixing some things that Andy and I agreed upon offline.