[AutoDiff][Sema] Correctly process differentiable function type declarations with inout or Void
#41422
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
philipturner
changed the title
philipturner
changed the title
inout or Void
Contributor
Author
|
This PR permanently closed by accident because I force-pushed without re-opening it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sourced from #41174. The previous pull request included some commentary that was off-topic or did not reflect an affinity for constructive criticism. On top of that, the goal changed from classifying
Voidas non-differentiable to resolving ambiguities between lack of a return type and lack of a differentiable return type. To make the process of reviewing easier, please use this new pull request instead.Resolves SR-15808 and SR-15818.