Dynamicism is not a word

[Goles]

Switched it for dynamism, which I guess was the original intent.

[MosheBerman]

[phroggyy]

@MosheBerman, it is indeed a word. However, the comments in the code imply a reduction of dynamicism. Dynamicisim is a hyopthesis, and hence cannot be concretely reduced, which is why we can probably assume dynamism was implied (as in making it less dynamic).

[Goles]

@MosheBerman interesting, I'm opening a PR in the Apple dictionary because it's not there...?

Anyway, I think dynamism is the correct way to go here ;)

[codyjk]

👍 to Dynamicism

[ashfurrow]

I like Dynammicism ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[Goles]

@MosheBerman Actually, I dug a bit deeper and it's not a word according to several English dictionaries (can't really search in Oxford's because one has to be a member...).

As @ashfurrow said... ¯(ツ)/¯

[fionagx]

Dynamicigery

[Bernard-Bernie-Sanders]

As a linguist, I agree to this in its entirety. The word is invalid (not able to exist) but clearly not intended or in actual (proper) use. Outsourcing, ey?

[MosheBerman]

@Goles I don't see it in my my paper dictionary. (Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Eleventh edition.)

Guess I'll join the party: ¯(ツ)/¯

[Bernard-Bernie-Sanders]

there is a not missing in my comment: "The word is not invalid but clearly not intended or in actual (proper) use."

[lattner]

d9e9fea changed the wording in this document to avoid the dynami-schism controversy :-)

[MosheBerman]

Lol, @lattner!

[Goles]

Neat! I guess I can sleep tonight.

Thanks @lattner!