Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sema: Fix another -require-explicit-availability regression #80613

Merged

Conversation

tshortli
Copy link
Contributor

@tshortli tshortli commented Apr 7, 2025

Extensions that extend non-public types should never be required to have explicit availability, even if they declare conformances to public protocols.

Resolves rdar://148697770.

Extensions that extend non-public types should never be required to have
explicit availability, even if they declare conformances to public protocols.

Resolves rdar://148697770.
@tshortli
Copy link
Contributor Author

tshortli commented Apr 7, 2025

@swift-ci please smoke test

@tshortli tshortli merged commit 3066570 into swiftlang:main Apr 8, 2025
3 checks passed
@tshortli tshortli deleted the require-explicit-availability-conformances branch April 8, 2025 14:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants