Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Without org layer, , displays "No previous search" in org mode #5502

Closed
edrex opened this issue Mar 15, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

Without org layer, , displays "No previous search" in org mode #5502

edrex opened this issue Mar 15, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@edrex
Copy link
Contributor

edrex commented Mar 15, 2016

I'd like to leave the org layer out, since it pulls in a bunch of optional packages I don't need. Unfortunately, without it the major mode leader doesn't work in org mode.

spc ? , with org layer: , spacemacs-org-mode-map-prefix

without org layer: , evil-repeat-find-char-reverse

Maybe the solution is to split the org layer up a bit, with a minimal default to make org work nicely with evil mode, and then an org-extra layer with all the bling. Or, since org is built into Emacs, maybe the basic evil integration should be built into spacemacs?

@TheBB
Copy link
Contributor

TheBB commented Mar 15, 2016

Yeah, this is entirely expected. If you want to use only parts of the org layer you should just exclude the packages you don't want.

@calebmeyer
Copy link

That seems reasonable, but since spacemacs documentation is all in org format, it's very hard to browse without the org layer. For example, pressing RET on a table of contents link doesn't follow it unless you have the org layer enabled.

@TheBB
Copy link
Contributor

TheBB commented Mar 15, 2016

That will be fixed by #5372

I don't see any reason to further split the org layer. After all that's exactly the kind of thing dotspacemacs-excluded-packages is for.

@edrex
Copy link
Contributor Author

edrex commented Mar 15, 2016

Ah, I didn't know about that PR, good to hear. I guess I'll leave this open till that lands.

@edrex
Copy link
Contributor Author

edrex commented Mar 15, 2016

Meh, closing.

@edrex edrex closed this as completed Mar 15, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants