Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve maintainability of assessments by abstracting away details of how assessments are stored #178

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2024

Conversation

ahumenberger
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ahumenberger ahumenberger force-pushed the 169-assessment-maintainability branch 4 times, most recently from 0004475 to fa8ac13 Compare June 11, 2024 16:46
@ahumenberger ahumenberger requested a review from bauersimon June 11, 2024 16:47
cmd/eval-dev-quality/cmd/evaluate.go Show resolved Hide resolved
evaluate/metrics/testing/assessments.go Show resolved Hide resolved
evaluate/evaluate_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
evaluate/report/csv_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ahumenberger ahumenberger self-assigned this Jun 14, 2024
@ahumenberger ahumenberger force-pushed the 169-assessment-maintainability branch from fa8ac13 to 3db146b Compare June 14, 2024 07:33
@ahumenberger ahumenberger force-pushed the 169-assessment-maintainability branch from 3db146b to fc407ee Compare June 14, 2024 07:45
@bauersimon bauersimon self-requested a review June 14, 2024 12:58
@bauersimon bauersimon merged commit c575c5b into main Jun 14, 2024
3 checks passed
@bauersimon bauersimon deleted the 169-assessment-maintainability branch June 14, 2024 13:03
@bauersimon bauersimon added the refactor Make code cleaner/better label Jul 31, 2024
@bauersimon bauersimon added this to the v0.6.0 milestone Jul 31, 2024
@bauersimon bauersimon mentioned this pull request Jul 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
refactor Make code cleaner/better
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants