Skip to content

Conversation

@weaverryan
Copy link
Member

Q A
Doc fix? no
New docs? no
Applies to all
Fixed tickets n/a

Hi guys!

After merging this nice new entry in #4141, I wanted to make a few minor language tweaks (the diff looks bigger than the changes really are). This included shortening a few sections and talking less about how all reverse proxies refuse to cache pages with a session, because I don't (for example) believe this is true with Symfony's reverse proxy.

Thanks!

@weaverryan weaverryan changed the title [#4141] Tweaks to the new form csrf caching entry Tweaks to the new form csrf caching entry Jan 4, 2015
@dbu
Copy link
Contributor

dbu commented Jan 5, 2015

seems good to me, easier to read and no mistakes introduced as far as i can see.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think there are some missing words here:

When a user submits, the token ...

Proposal:

When a user submits the form, the token ...

@weaverryan weaverryan merged commit cc40b5c into 2.3 Jan 16, 2015
weaverryan added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2015
This PR was merged into the 2.3 branch.

Discussion
----------

Tweaks to the new form csrf caching entry

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Doc fix?      | no
| New docs?     | no
| Applies to    | all
| Fixed tickets | n/a

Hi guys!

After merging this nice new entry in #4141, I wanted to make a few minor language tweaks (the diff looks bigger than the changes really are). This included shortening a few sections and talking less about how *all* reverse proxies refuse to cache pages with a session, because I don't (for example) believe this is true with Symfony's reverse proxy.

Thanks!

Commits
-------

cc40b5c Adding missing words thanks to javiereguiluz
1c568e1 [#4141] Tweaks to the new form csrf caching entry
@xabbuh xabbuh deleted the csrf-form-tweaks branch January 16, 2015 17:58
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't it be "is" instead of "are"? And should we add a label for the old headline?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're right! Fixed at sha: 36d1bac

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants