-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Removed the glossary #5464
Removed the glossary #5464
Conversation
@wouterj I am more concerned about the link to the glossary in the navigation. Would be bad if a link led to a non-existing page. |
👍, but only after Javier is able to remove the Glosaary link on http://symfony.com/doc/current/index.html |
Ah, missed that link. Indeed, we should wait until the link is removed from the index |
ping @javiereguiluz Did you already create a PR to remove the glossary link? |
I'm sorry to bother you again, @javiereguiluz, but what is the status of this? |
ping @javiereguiluz :) |
👍 Ping @javiereguiluz - only this needs to be done here: #5464 (comment) |
The glossary has now been unlinked from the Symfony Docs index (it will be public after the next deployment). |
Thanks @javiereguiluz! I've rebased this PR, it's ready to merge once symfony.com is redeployed. status: reviewed |
This PR was submitted for the 2.3 branch but it was merged into the 2.7 branch instead (closes symfony#5464). Discussion ---------- Removed the glossary | Q | A | --- | --- | Doc fix? | yes | New docs? | no | Applies to | all | Fixed tickets | symfony#5462 It's funny that 99% of the `:term:` usages were located in sentences describing a term. So we didn't loose any information there. In some cases, I've tweaked the sentence a bit not loose any important information. As for the genindex mentioned by @xabbuh in the issue, I believe this one is created automatically by Sphinx based on all `.. index::` directives in the documentation. When removing the glossary, the genindex will automatically not include the terms anymore (/cc @javiereguiluz please confirm). Commits ------- 1c05aad Removed the glossary
@wouterj Thank you! |
It's funny that 99% of the
:term:
usages were located in sentences describing a term. So we didn't loose any information there. In some cases, I've tweaked the sentence a bit not loose any important information.As for the genindex mentioned by @xabbuh in the issue, I believe this one is created automatically by Sphinx based on all
.. index::
directives in the documentation. When removing the glossary, the genindex will automatically not include the terms anymore (/cc @javiereguiluz please confirm).