Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Cookbook][Security] clarify description of the getPosition() method #5767

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2015

Conversation

xabbuh
Copy link
Member

@xabbuh xabbuh commented Oct 7, 2015

Q A
Doc fix? yes
New docs? no
Applies to all
Fixed tickets

@@ -354,8 +354,8 @@ requires the following methods:
to the DI container for the appropriate security context.

``getPosition``
Method which must be of type ``pre_auth``, ``form``, ``http``,
and ``remember_me`` and defines the position at which the provider is called.
Method which defines the position at which the provider is called. The
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about: "Returns when the provider should be called. This can be one of pre_auth, form, http or remember_me."

@weaverryan weaverryan merged commit 74771b7 into symfony:2.3 Nov 5, 2015
weaverryan added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2015
…on() method (xabbuh)

This PR was merged into the 2.3 branch.

Discussion
----------

[Cookbook][Security] clarify description of the getPosition() method

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Doc fix?      | yes
| New docs?     | no
| Applies to    | all
| Fixed tickets |

Commits
-------

74771b7 clarify description of the getPosition() method
@xabbuh xabbuh deleted the language-tweak branch November 5, 2015 17:03
@xabbuh
Copy link
Member Author

xabbuh commented Nov 5, 2015

@wouterj Sorry, I missed your comment. Do you think we should make that change?

@weaverryan
Copy link
Member

No worries - I did it. Working with limited internet, so I didn't post here about that :)

@xabbuh
Copy link
Member Author

xabbuh commented Nov 5, 2015

Thanks :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants