Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(solidity-devops): allow verifier fo be omitted for a chain #2659

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 2, 2024

Conversation

ChiTimesChi
Copy link
Collaborator

@ChiTimesChi ChiTimesChi commented Jun 2, 2024

Description
A clear and concise description of the features you're adding in this pull request.

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem you're solving.

Metadata

  • Fixes #[Link to Issue]

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a check to ensure that the verifier is enabled for a specific chain before proceeding with certain operations.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced the method for reading chain verification options to improve reliability.

@ChiTimesChi ChiTimesChi requested a review from trajan0x as a code owner June 2, 2024 12:04
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the forgeScriptRun.js by incorporating the isVerifierEnabled function to conditionally check verifier status alongside broadcasting. Additionally, updates in chain.js include the introduction of the isVerifierEnabled function and a shift from readEnv to tryReadEnv in readChainVerificationOptions.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../forgeScriptRun.js Added isVerifierEnabled to imports and updated condition to check isVerifierEnabled(chainName) alongside isBroadcast.
.../utils/chain.js Added tryReadEnv import, introduced isVerifierEnabled function, and updated readChainVerificationOptions to use tryReadEnv.

Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant forgeScriptRun.js
    participant chain.js

    User->>forgeScriptRun.js: Run script
    forgeScriptRun.js->>chain.js: Call isVerifierEnabled(chainName)
    chain.js-->>forgeScriptRun.js: Return verifier status
    forgeScriptRun.js->>forgeScriptRun.js: Check isBroadcast && isVerifierEnabled
    alt Broadcast and Verifier enabled
        forgeScriptRun.js->>User: Proceed with verification
    else Broadcast or Verifier disabled
        forgeScriptRun.js->>User: Skip verification
    end
Loading

Poem

In the code where scripts align,
A verifier now checks the sign.
If broadcast sings and chains are true,
The script will dance, a perfect cue.
Changes flow like rivers wide,
With tryReadEnv as our guide.
Code evolves, with joy we stride.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 39.80451%. Comparing base (df0d899) to head (c95ecbe).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##              master       #2659         +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage   39.79772%   39.80451%   +0.00679%     
===================================================
  Files            180         180                 
  Lines          14732       14732                 
  Branches          80          80                 
===================================================
+ Hits            5863        5864          +1     
  Misses          8102        8102                 
+ Partials         767         766          -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
packages 90.57540% <ø> (+0.09920%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

Deploying sanguine-fe with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: c95ecbe
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://78db5992.sanguine-fe.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://fix-sol-devops-verifier-none.sanguine-fe.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/solidity-devops/js/utils/chain.js (1)

Line range hint 58-67: Function readChainVerificationOptions updated to use tryReadEnv and handle multiple verifiers. The else clause can be omitted as suggested by static analysis.

-    default:
-      return '';
Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 36e77b4 and c95ecbe.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/solidity-devops/js/forgeScriptRun.js (2 hunks)
  • packages/solidity-devops/js/utils/chain.js (5 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
packages/solidity-devops/js/forgeScriptRun.js

[error] 2-2: A Node.js builtin module should be imported with the node: protocol.


[error] 61-64: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.

packages/solidity-devops/js/utils/chain.js

[error] 100-117: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.

Additional comments not posted (4)
packages/solidity-devops/js/forgeScriptRun.js (2)

4-8: Import statement updated to include isVerifierEnabled. This aligns with the new feature implementation.


49-49: Conditional logic correctly updated to include verifier check. Ensure that isVerifierEnabled function is robust and handles all edge cases.

packages/solidity-devops/js/utils/chain.js (2)

10-10: Import statement updated to include tryReadEnv. This change supports more robust environment variable handling.


156-156: Module exports updated to include isVerifierEnabled, ensuring it's available for use in other modules.

Comment on lines +31 to +43
/**
* Checks if any verifier is enabled for the given chain.
*
* This function determines if a verifier (like Etherscan, Blockscout, or Sourcify)
* is configured and enabled for the specified chain by checking if the verifier
* settings are present in the environment variables.
*
* @param {string} chainName - The name of the chain to check for verifier settings
* @returns {boolean} True if a verifier is enabled, false otherwise
*/
const isVerifierEnabled = (chainName) => {
return readChainVerificationOptions(chainName).length > 0
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

New function isVerifierEnabled correctly implements the feature to check verifier status. Consider adding logging to trace which verifier is enabled or if none are.

+ logInfo(`Verifier status for ${chainName}: ${result}`);

Committable suggestion was skipped due low confidence.

@ChiTimesChi ChiTimesChi merged commit 972afed into master Jun 2, 2024
50 checks passed
@ChiTimesChi ChiTimesChi deleted the fix/sol-devops-verifier-none branch June 2, 2024 12:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant