Skip to content

Conversation

paescuj
Copy link
Contributor

@paescuj paescuj commented May 18, 2022

Closes #7, closes #4 as replacement (and also closes #2 since I made sure the test is valid)

Additionally, this pull request updates the dependencies.

@joshuadelange
Copy link

This PR would really help us a lot. Is there any possibility to get this merged & released?

If it needs more work we can consider helping out a bit too.

cc: @blahah

@paescuj
Copy link
Contributor Author

paescuj commented Mar 6, 2023

Ready from my side! Happy to do some final adjustments if necessary.

@blahah
Copy link
Contributor

blahah commented Jun 14, 2023

Sorry for the delay - looks good, merging

@blahah blahah merged commit 29bac8b into syntax-tree:master Jun 14, 2023
@paescuj
Copy link
Contributor Author

paescuj commented Jun 14, 2023

Sorry for the delay - looks good, merging

Awesome, thanks! 🎉 No worries, that's how things are in the world of open source 😃

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ts type? Unit test defect (does not impact package functionality)
3 participants