Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

centos: Drop c9s epel requirement for systemd-boot #1413

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2023

Conversation

DaanDeMeyer
Copy link
Contributor

It's available in the base repositories now.

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

You have successfully added a new shellcheck configuration differential-shellcheck. As part of the setup process, we have scanned this repository and found no existing alerts. In the future, you will see all code scanning alerts on the repository Security tab.

@behrmann
Copy link
Contributor

@mrc0mmand the above message from the code scanning bot has appeared on every new PR for a week now, is there a way to shut it up?

mrc0mmand added a commit to mrc0mmand/mkosi that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2023
to get rid of the annoying message on new PRs.

Also, update the action to the latest version and drop now unnecessary
permissions.

See: redhat-plumbers-in-action/differential-shellcheck#215
Addresses: systemd#1413 (comment)
@mrc0mmand
Copy link
Member

@mrc0mmand the above message from the code scanning bot has appeared on every new PR for a week now, is there a way to shut it up?

#1414

behrmann pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2023
to get rid of the annoying message on new PRs.

Also, update the action to the latest version and drop now unnecessary
permissions.

See: redhat-plumbers-in-action/differential-shellcheck#215
Addresses: #1413 (comment)
It's available in the base repositories now. We still need epel on
the redhat derivatives for now.
@DaanDeMeyer DaanDeMeyer merged commit b0e95b1 into systemd:main Mar 29, 2023
@DaanDeMeyer DaanDeMeyer deleted the c9s-boot branch March 29, 2023 07:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants